Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 25;19(7):595–609. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.938605

Table 5 .

Goodness-of-fit indices for the three measurement models for CASP-19, CASP-12v.1, and CASP-12v.2 in the HAPIEE wave 1.

  Czech Republic
Russia
Poland
Measures CFI TLI RMSEA CFI TLI RMSEA CFI TLI RMSEA
CASP-19
 Single-factor model 0.86 0.85 0.10 0.73 0.69 0.15 0.85 0.83 0.11
 First-order model : four-factor 0.90 0.88 0.09 0.83 0.80 0.12 0.89 0.87 0.10
 Second-order model: four-factor 0.88 0.86 0.10 0.81 0.78 0.12 0.87 0.85 0.10
CASP-12v.1
 Single-factor model 0.92 0.90 0.09 0.69 0.62 0.17 0.89 0.86 0.11
 First-order model: three-factor 0.96 0.95 0.07 0.89 0.84 0.11 0.96 0.94 0.08
 Second-order model: three-factor 0.95 0.93 0.08 0.83 0.78 0.13 0.94 0.92 0.08
CASP-12v.2
 Single-factor model 0.93 0.91 0.09 0.72 0.66 0.17 0.90 0.88 0.11
 First-order model: three-factor 0.88 0.84 0.12 0.88 0.84 0.12 0.96 0.95 0.07
 Second-order model: three-factor 0.96 0.94 0.08 0.86 0.82 0.13 0.96 0.95 0.07

Note: CFI = comparative fit index, values >0.90 indicate good fit; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index, values >0.90 indicate good fit; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation, values <0.05 indicate good fit.