Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2015 May;42(5):243–245. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000270

Table 1.

Comparison of selected demographics pre- and post- website design change

Variable Pre-website
design change
(N=575)
Post-website
design change
(N=636)
p-value
(** indicates
statistical
significance)
Age (Mean, SD) 28.1 (8.2) 26.9 (8.0) 0.013**

Missing Age (N, %) 15 (2.6) 0(0)

Gender (total, %) 0.572
Male 225 259 (59.3)
Female 350 377 (40.7)
Missing 0 (0) 0 (0)

Race (N, %) 0.006**
White 142 (24.7) 211 (33.2)
African American 142 (24.7) 337 (53)
Other 52 (9.0) 88 (13.8)
Missing 239 (41.6) 0 (0)

Location 0.012**
Baltimore City 180 (31.3) 251 (39.5)
Maryland 367 (63.8) 358 (56.3)
Washington D.C. 28 (4.9) 27 (4.2)
Missing 0 (0) 0 (0)

Risk Score (Mean, SD) 4.7 (1.9) 5.2 (1.8) 0.000**

Missing Risk Score (N, %) 248 (43.1) 0 (0)

Positive STI results (N, %) 57 (9.9) 87 (13.7) 0.043**

Treatment Adherence 0.075
Yes 44 (77.2) 76 (88.4)
No 13 (22.8) 10 (11.6)

Return participants 0.261
Yes 159 (27.7) 207 (32.6)
No 380 (66) 429 (67.4)
Missing 36 (6.3) 0 (0)

Number of uses in the 6-month study period
1 Unavailable 506 (79.6)
2 Unavailable 92 (14.5)
3 Unavailable 33 (5.2)
4 – 5 Unavailable 5 (0.8)

Participants testing for a rescreen 0.016**
Yes 72 (12.5) 145 (22.8)
No 358 (62.3) 491 (77.2)
Missing 145 (25.2) 0 (0)