Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 31;2015:328545. doi: 10.1155/2015/328545

Table 1.

Effect of AGE and SAC on serum triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, and LDL/HDL ratio (AI).

Treatment TG (mg/dL) TC (mg/dL) HDL (mg/dL) LDL (mg/dL) AI
NFD control 71.04 ± 0.51 79.39 ± 0.81 33.10 ± 0.23 60.49 ± 0.55 1.82 ± 0.12
 NFD + AGE-L 63.40 ± 1.26∗∗ 65.12 ± 1.49∗∗∗ 41.23 ± 1.28 36.57 ± 0.87∗∗∗ 0.88 ± 0.07∗∗∗
 NFD + AGE-H 50.12 ± 0.93∗∗∗ 55.64 ± 0.33∗∗∗ 44.38 ± 0.96∗∗∗ 21.28 ± 1.07∗∗∗ 0.47 ± 0.02∗∗∗
 NFD + SAC-L 65.39 ± 1.30∗∗ 68.21 ± 0.74∗∗∗ 39.49 ± 1.24 41.79 ± 0.91∗∗∗ 1.05 ± 0.21∗∗∗
 NFD + SAC-H 61.61 ± 0.21∗∗∗ 61.21 ± 1.09∗∗∗ 42.52 ± 1.41∗∗∗ 31.01 ± 1.16∗∗∗ 0.72 ± 0.06∗∗∗
HFD control 118.23 ± 1.18aaa 123.33 ± 0.71aaa 31.07 ± 0.81 115.90 ± 0.82aaa 3.73 ± 0.33aaa
 HFD + AGE-L 91.20 ± 1.01∗∗∗ 94.14 ± 1.44∗∗∗ 46.22 ± 1.65∗∗∗ 66.16 ± 0.97∗∗∗ 1.43 ± 0.21∗∗∗
 HFD + AGE-H 79.32 ± 1.09∗∗∗ 81.23 ± 1.66∗∗∗ 53.89 ± 0.89∗∗∗ 43.20 ± 0.65∗∗∗ 0.80 ± 0.05∗∗∗
 HFD + SAC-L 99.12 ± 1.43∗∗∗ 101.40 ± 1.06∗∗∗ 43.24 ± 0.50∗∗ 77.98 ± 0.48∗∗∗ 1.80 ± 0.36∗∗∗
 HFD + SAC-H 81.322 ± 0.68∗∗∗ 96.38 ± 0.98∗∗∗ 48.89 ± 1.45∗∗∗ 63.75 ± 0.43∗∗∗ 1.30 ± 0.21∗∗∗

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of eight rats. AGE-L: low dose of AGE, 2 mL/kg; AGE-H: high dose of AGE, 5 mL/kg; SAC-L: low dose of SAC, 13.1 mg/kg; and SAC-H: high dose of SAC, 32.76 mg/kg.

Symbols represent statistical significance.

∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗ P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 NFD fed versus NFD control and HFD fed versus HFD control respectively. aaa P < 0.001 NFD control versus HFD control.