Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atherosclerosis. 2015 Mar 9;240(1):121–124. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.03.007

Table 1.

Comparison of endotoxin content of different apolipoprotein reagents

source of apolipoprotein digested (EU/μg) undigested (EU/μg) endotoxin in culture medium (ng/ml)1 inhibited proliferation
Company A human plasma ApoA-I 1.63 0.46 0.163 yes
Company B E. coli recombinant ApoA-I >20.00 -- >2.000 yes
Company C HEC 293 recombinant ApoA-I 1.31 0.00 0.131 no
Company A human plasma ApoA-II 0.01 -- 0.001 no
Company A human plasma ApoA-IV 0.22 -- 0.022 yes
1

total endotoxin when apolipoprotein was added at a concentration of 1 μg/ml of culture medium. Assumes 1 EU = 0.1 ng endotoxin.

Samples were assayed for endotoxin using the Lonza PyroGene assay either without or following protease digestion. Protease treatment allows for determination of total endotoxin content including endotoxin whose activity may be masked by associated protein. Under certain conditions, ApoA-I can bind endotoxin and neutralize its activity. Without protease treatment, only endotoxin that is freely available to inhibit macrophage proliferation would be measured. The endotoxin concentrations of the apolipoprotein preparations that inhibited macrophage proliferation were sufficiently high to inhibit macrophage proliferation. Interestingly, Company C ApoA-I did not inhibit macrophage proliferation, presumably because its endotoxin content was completely masked (compare protease-digested and -undigested endotoxin levels).