Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 9;26(2):100–110. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.100

Supplementary Table 1. Assessment of nerve sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer.

Study Sites of nerve preservation Success rate (%)
Hypogastric nerve Pelvic splanchnic nerve Vesical branch of pelvic plexus Failure At least one side
Possover et al. (2000) [16] O
Trimbos et al. (2001) [7] O O O
Querleu et al. (2002) [21] O* O* O*
Todo et al. (2006) [22] O O O 0 100
Raspagliesi et al. (2006) [10] O O O
Pieterse et al. (2008) [9] O O O
Van den Tillaart et al. (2009) [17] O O O 19.7 80.3
Cibula et al. (2010) [23] O O O
Espino-Strebel et al. (2010) [24] O O O
Liang et al. (2010) [25] O O O
Skret-Magierlo et al. (2010) [18] O O O 0 100
Wu et al. (2010) [12] O O O
Cibula et al. (2011) [26] O O O
Ditto et al. (2011) [27] O O O
Ceccaroni et al. (2012) [28] O O O
Chen et al. (2012) [13] O O O
Tseng et al. (2012) [19] O O O 5.6 94.4
Pieterse et al. (2013) [29] O O O 0 100
Bogani et al. (2014) [20] O O O
Wang et al. (2014) [30] O O O

△ not mentioned. *27.1% of patients who received nerve sparing surgery underwent radical trachelectomy. 6.8% of patients who underwent nerve sparing radical hysterectomy received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 7.1% and 14.1% of all patients underwent radical parametrectomy and trachelectomy, respectively.