. 2014 Apr 15;52(5):2869–2877. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1351-5

Table 3.

Texture profile analysis of hardness and chewiness in the experimental treatments

Treatments	Texture Profile Analysis
Treatments	Hardness (N)	Chewiness
T1	36.91^a (±8.09)	2,544.45^a (±711.41)
T2	32.64^ab (±6.94)	2,258.90^a (±503.22)
T3	25.93^b (±5.66)	1,644.54^b (±542.02)
T4	25.06^b (±2.42)	1,682.84^b (±375.78)
T5	32.96^ab (±6.52)	2,337.74^a (±548.22)

Results are the mean ± standard deviation. The means followed by the same lowercase letters in the columns comparing the texture profile analysis among treatments do not differ according to Tukey’s test (p > 0.05)

T1 1 % transglutaminase; T2 1 % transglutaminase and 15 % MSCM; T3 1 % egg albumin powder; T4 1 % egg albumin powder and 15 % MSCM; T5 1 % transglutaminase, 1 % egg albumin powder and 15 % MSCM