Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 2;52(5):2711–2720. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1300-3

Table 1.

Changes in antioxidant activity (AA) with different radical scavenging assays of ‘Hayward’ kiwi fruit as influenced by conditioning, 1-MCP and conditioning plus 1-MCP treatments during storage

Samples Weeks of storage
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Control ABTS 13.27 ± 1.3a 13.34 ± 1.3a 13.49 ± 1.2a 13.51 ± 1.4a 13.54 ± 1.2a 13.59 ± 1.3a 13.61 ± 1.4a
Co ABTS 13.29 ± 1.1a 13.41 ± 1.2a 13.68 ± 0.9a 13.75 ± 1.1a 13.98 ± 1.5a 14.18 ± 1.2b 14.56 ± 1.5b
MCP ABTS 13.29 ± 1.4a 13.52 ± 1.1a 13.87 ± 1.3a 14.22 ± 1.4b 14.39 ± 1.2b 14.67 ± 1.1b 14.87 ± 1.4b
Co + MCP ABTS 13.32 ± 1.2a 13.67 ± 1.5a 13.98 ± 1.1a 14.54 ± 1.6ab 14.69 ± 0.9ab 14.78 ± 1.2ab 15.01 ± 1.6ab
Control FRAP 8.16 ± 0.9a 8.20 ± 0.5a 8.27 ± 0.8a 8.31 ± 0.9a 8.38 ± 0.7a 8.41 ± 0.8a 8.45 ± 0.9a
Co FRAP 8.18 ± 1.1a 8.22 ± 0.8a 8.32 ± 0.7a 8.41 ± 0.7a 8.54 ± 0.8a 8.62 ± 0.8a 8.72 ± 0.8a
MCP FRAP 8.18 ± 0.7a 8.32 ± 0.9a 8.48 ± 0.8a 8.56 ± 0.8a 8.65 ± 0.7a 8.75 ± 0.7a 8.87 ± 0.7a
Co + MCP FRAP 8.21 ± 0.8a 8.45 ± 0.7a 8.68 ± 0.8a 8.79 ± 0.9ab 8.87 ± 0.6ab 8.91 ± 0.7ab 9.23 ± 0.7b
Control CUPRAC 12.89 ± 0.9a 12.91 ± 1.1a 12.95 ± 1.2a 13.01 ± 1.6a 13.21 ± 1.1ab 13.25 ± 1.3b 13.28 ± 1.3b
Co CUPRAC 12.91 ± 0.8a 13.11 ± 0.9ab 13.78 ± 1.4ab 13.86 ± 1.3ab 13.91 ± 0.9b 13.99 ± 1.2b 14.21 ± 1.5b
MCP CUPRAC 12.92 ± 0.7a 13.41 ± 1.2ab 13.87 ± 1.4ab 13.97 ± 1.2ab 14.23 ± 1.2b 14.45 ± 1.4b 14.53 ± 1.2b
Co + MCP CUPRAC 12.94 ± 1.1a 13.65 ± 1.4a 14.56 ± 1.2b 14.65 ± 1.3b 14.75 ± 1.2b 14.81 ± 1.1b 14.89 ± 1.1b

ABTS •+ 2, 2-Azino-bis (3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt, FRAP Ferric-reducing/antioxidant power, CUPRAC Cupric reducing antioxidant capacity; Control, without any treatment; Co Prestorage conditioning at 20°C for 2 days, MCP 1-methylcyclopropene, 1 ppm for 16 h; Co + MCP Conditioning +1 ppm for 16 h, DW Values of ABTS, FRAP, CUPRAC are in μM TE/g, TE 6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid, Trolox, equivalent, DW dry weight

Each observation is a mean ± SD; n = 10; values with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05