Table 1.
Samples | Weeks of storage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | |
Control ABTS | 13.27 ± 1.3a | 13.34 ± 1.3a | 13.49 ± 1.2a | 13.51 ± 1.4a | 13.54 ± 1.2a | 13.59 ± 1.3a | 13.61 ± 1.4a |
Co ABTS | 13.29 ± 1.1a | 13.41 ± 1.2a | 13.68 ± 0.9a | 13.75 ± 1.1a | 13.98 ± 1.5a | 14.18 ± 1.2b | 14.56 ± 1.5b |
MCP ABTS | 13.29 ± 1.4a | 13.52 ± 1.1a | 13.87 ± 1.3a | 14.22 ± 1.4b | 14.39 ± 1.2b | 14.67 ± 1.1b | 14.87 ± 1.4b |
Co + MCP ABTS | 13.32 ± 1.2a | 13.67 ± 1.5a | 13.98 ± 1.1a | 14.54 ± 1.6ab | 14.69 ± 0.9ab | 14.78 ± 1.2ab | 15.01 ± 1.6ab |
Control FRAP | 8.16 ± 0.9a | 8.20 ± 0.5a | 8.27 ± 0.8a | 8.31 ± 0.9a | 8.38 ± 0.7a | 8.41 ± 0.8a | 8.45 ± 0.9a |
Co FRAP | 8.18 ± 1.1a | 8.22 ± 0.8a | 8.32 ± 0.7a | 8.41 ± 0.7a | 8.54 ± 0.8a | 8.62 ± 0.8a | 8.72 ± 0.8a |
MCP FRAP | 8.18 ± 0.7a | 8.32 ± 0.9a | 8.48 ± 0.8a | 8.56 ± 0.8a | 8.65 ± 0.7a | 8.75 ± 0.7a | 8.87 ± 0.7a |
Co + MCP FRAP | 8.21 ± 0.8a | 8.45 ± 0.7a | 8.68 ± 0.8a | 8.79 ± 0.9ab | 8.87 ± 0.6ab | 8.91 ± 0.7ab | 9.23 ± 0.7b |
Control CUPRAC | 12.89 ± 0.9a | 12.91 ± 1.1a | 12.95 ± 1.2a | 13.01 ± 1.6a | 13.21 ± 1.1ab | 13.25 ± 1.3b | 13.28 ± 1.3b |
Co CUPRAC | 12.91 ± 0.8a | 13.11 ± 0.9ab | 13.78 ± 1.4ab | 13.86 ± 1.3ab | 13.91 ± 0.9b | 13.99 ± 1.2b | 14.21 ± 1.5b |
MCP CUPRAC | 12.92 ± 0.7a | 13.41 ± 1.2ab | 13.87 ± 1.4ab | 13.97 ± 1.2ab | 14.23 ± 1.2b | 14.45 ± 1.4b | 14.53 ± 1.2b |
Co + MCP CUPRAC | 12.94 ± 1.1a | 13.65 ± 1.4a | 14.56 ± 1.2b | 14.65 ± 1.3b | 14.75 ± 1.2b | 14.81 ± 1.1b | 14.89 ± 1.1b |
ABTS •+ 2, 2-Azino-bis (3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt, FRAP Ferric-reducing/antioxidant power, CUPRAC Cupric reducing antioxidant capacity; Control, without any treatment; Co Prestorage conditioning at 20°C for 2 days, MCP 1-methylcyclopropene, 1 ppm for 16 h; Co + MCP Conditioning +1 ppm for 16 h, DW Values of ABTS, FRAP, CUPRAC are in μM TE/g, TE 6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid, Trolox, equivalent, DW dry weight
Each observation is a mean ± SD; n = 10; values with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05