Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Care Forum. 2014 Aug 7;44(1):133–157. doi: 10.1007/s10566-014-9274-x

Table 4.

Comparisons of Non-EBT and EBT trained clinicians on Decision Making Strategies

Non-EBT
n=34
Mean (SD)
EBT
n=14
Mean (SD)
t df Sig.
P-value
Cohen’s
d
Effect
Size r
# of vignettes
completed
2.91
(.98)
3.00
(.96)
−0.73 44 .43 .22 .11
Total length of
response
57.09
(35.81)
58.20
(34.03)
0.27 44 .79 .08 .04
# Questions 15.06
(12.45)
8.43
(4.7)
1.92 44 .06 .58 .28
# Dx 1.79
(1.40)
.81
(.76)
2.29 44 .03* .69 .33
% Time
discussing Tx
24.94
(15.75)
36.36
(13.97)
−2.38 44 .02* .72 .34
Extensiveness of
Tx
2.88
(1.27)
3.93
(1.14)
−2.26 44 .03* .68 .32
Mean % of EBT .16
(.39)
.64
(.59)
−3.408 47 .001*** .98 .44
# standardized
assessment
.09
(.31)
.11
(.43)
−0.36 44 .72 .11 .05
Total # of factors
attended
26.40
(8.86)
23.79
(5.60)
1.02 47 .31 .30 .15
Mean # of
child factors
3.82
(1.94)
3.42
(1.66)
.675 47 .50 .22 .11
Mean # of parent
factors
2.15
(1.10)
1.82
(.61)
1.056 47 .29 .37 .18
Mean # of
family factors
3.40
(1.13)
2.72
(.86)
2.025 47 .04* .68 .32

Notes: EBT= evidence based treatment, Dx= diagnoses, Tx= treatment, ,

*

= p<.05,

**

= p<.01,

***

= p<.001