Table 2.

Results of analyses comparing the loci of maximal suppression for pairs of CDFs

CDF1	CDF2	COM1 (Hz)	COM2 (Hz)	p-value
4 vs 0	10 vs 0	15.96	15.51	0.4754
4 vs 0	32 vs 0	15.96	34.46	0.0037
4 vs 0	96 vs 0	15.96	72.27	<0.0001
10 vs 0	32 vs 0	15.51	34.46	0.0002
10 vs 0	96 vs 0	15.51	72.27	<0.0001
32 vs 0	96 vs 0	34.46	72.27	<0.0001
10 vs 4	32 vs 4	45.39	70.79	0.0097
10 vs 4	96 vs 4	45.39	119.32	0.0024
32 vs 4	96 vs 4	70.79	119.32	0.0008
32 vs 10	96 vs 10	86.03	128.73	0.0008

Conventions for referring to the CDFs are the same as in Table 2. Values for the COM of each CDF are middle columns. p-values in the rightmost column reflect results of a permutation test comparing actual disparities in the COMs with simulated disparities based on iterated random data mixtures (see Materials and Methods). Significant results are shown in black and nonsignificant results are shown in gray.