Table 2.
Confirmatory factor analysis of Perceived performance benefits
| Perceived Performance Benefits | Loadings | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | |
| Individual performance improvements (family physician) | |||||
| Improved the quality of preventive care given to my patients | .86 | - | - | - | - |
| Improved the monitoring of my patients with chronic diseases | .82 | - | - | - | - |
| Improved the safety of care for my patients | .69 | - | - | - | - |
| Facilitated application of clinical care guidelines for my patients | .85 | - | - | - | - |
| Facilitated my clinical decision making | .81 | - | - | - | - |
| Improved the quality of prescriptions to my patients | .61 | - | - | - | - |
| Improved the quality of my documentation and clinical notes | - | .70 | - | - | - |
| Improved my communications with health care providers | - | .74 | - | - | - |
| Allowed me to use clinical resources more wisely | - | .78 | - | - | - |
| Reduced the average length of my patient consultations | - | .78 | - | - | - |
| Allowed me to be more efficient | - | .79 | - | - | - |
| Improved communications and interactions with my patients | - | .80 | - | - | - |
| Reduced my time spent on medical documentation and ordering | - | .71 | - | - | - |
| Organizational performance improvements (family practice) | |||||
| Improved the efficiency of the clinic’s staff | - | - | .60 | - | - |
| Improved teamwork and the continuity of care | - | - | .62 | - | - |
| Decreased the clinic’s operating costs | - | - | - | .70 | - |
| Reduced the number of “no shows” | - | - | .72 | - | - |
| Increased the clinic’s revenues | - | - | - | .83 | - |
| Improved the quality of services delivered to the clinic’s patients | - | - | .82 | - | - |
| Decreased the number of patient visits to the clinic | - | - | .76 | - | - |
| Improved collaboration with other clinical care providers | - | - | .73 | - | - |
| Improved prescription management at the clinic | - | - | .64 | - | - |
| Increased access to care for the community served by the clinic | - | - | - | - | .89 |
| Increased immunization rates in the community we serve | - | - | - | - | .77 |
| Composite reliability | .90 | .90 | .87 | .74 | .82 |
| Average variance extracted | .61 | .58 | .49 | .59 | .69 |
aOn a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: neutral, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree).
F1: Quality of Care provided by the physician.
F2: Efficiency of the physician.
F3: Practice’s workflow (Operational Performance).
F4: Practice’s financial position (Economic Performance).
F5: Practice’s community (Social Performance).