Table 3.
Comparison of callus shape and type according to Li et al. [34] between the two groups
Classification | Number of tibias | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Treatment group (injection) | Control group (noninjection) | ||
Callus shape | 0.66 | ||
Fusiform | 2 | 4 | |
Cylindrical | 18 | 16 | |
Concave | 0 | 0 | |
Lateral | 0 | 0 | |
Central | 0 | 0 | |
Callus type | 0.66 | ||
Normal density | 16 | 18 | |
Intermediate density | 4 | 2 | |
Low density | 0 | 0 |