Table 3.
Comparison of callus shape and type according to Li et al. [34] between the two groups
| Classification | Number of tibias | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group (injection) | Control group (noninjection) | ||
| Callus shape | 0.66 | ||
| Fusiform | 2 | 4 | |
| Cylindrical | 18 | 16 | |
| Concave | 0 | 0 | |
| Lateral | 0 | 0 | |
| Central | 0 | 0 | |
| Callus type | 0.66 | ||
| Normal density | 16 | 18 | |
| Intermediate density | 4 | 2 | |
| Low density | 0 | 0 | |