Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 9;8:60. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0239-6

Table 6.

Impact of acetic acid on xylose fermentation by large isolate populations (A 620= 50)

A. Comparative fermentation of 75 g/L xylose in ODM with 5 to 15 g/L acetic acid by isolates precultured on xylose
Adaptation stress Isolate Xylose uptake rate (g/L/hA) a,b Ethanol productivity (g/L/hA) a,b Ethanol yield per initial sugar (g/g) b
AFEX CSH 33 Colony 5 0.090 A 0.0231 AB 0.26 B
AFEX CSH > E 28 2A.1.53R-E30-C3 0.078 AB 0.0197 ABC 0.23 BCD
AFEX CSH > E (UV) 30 2A.1.30R2-E40-C5 0.071 BC 0.0155 ABCDE 0.20 DE
AFEX CSH > E > PSGHL 13 2A.1.53R S100E40-1 0.069 BC 0.0249 A 0.23 BCD
AFEX CSH > E > PSGHL 16 2A.1.53R-1 0.078 AB 0.0175 ABCD 0.25 BC
AFEX CSH > PSGHL 11 Colony 5-GP6 0.066 BC 0.0141 BCDE 0.21 CD
PSGHL 3 Y-7124 S90E40-1 0.043 D 0.0080 DE 0.14 F
PSGHL 14 Y-7124-6 0.053 CD 0.0105 CDE 0.16 EF
PSGHL 15 Y-7124-10 0.045 D 0.0061 E 0.30 A
Wild 1 Y-7124 0.060 C 0.0148 BCDE 0.19 DE
Acetic acid (g/L)
5 0.083 A 0.0223 A 0.29 A
10 0.065 B 0.0152 B 0.22 B
15 0.048 C 0.0088 C 0.14 C
B. Comparative fermentation of 75 g/L xylose in ODM with 5 to 15 g/L acetic acid by isolates precultured on glucose
Adaptation stress Isolate Xylose uptake rate (g/L/hA) a,b Ethanol productivity (g/L/hA) a,b Ethanol yield per initial sugar (g/g) b
AFEX CSH 33 Colony 5 0.014 C 0.0027 B 0.09 C
AFEX CSH > E 28 2A.1.53R-E30-C3 0.018 C 0.0039 B 0.09 C
AFEX CSH > E (UV) 30 2A.1.30R2-E40-C5 0.029 BC 0.0094 AB 0.16 BC
AFEX CSH > E > PSGHL 13 2A.1.53R S100E40-1 0.021 C 0.0047 B 0.18 B
AFEX CSH > E > PSGHL 16 2A.1.53R-1 0.019 C 0.0044 B 0.16 BC
AFEX CSH > PSGHL 11 Colony 5-GP6 0.014 C 0.0049 B 0.15 BC
PSGHL 3 Y-7124 S90E40-1 0.058 A 0.0165 A 0.26 A
PSGHL 14 Y-7124-6 0.044 AB 0.0108 AB 0.27 A
PSGHL 15 Y-7124-10 0.050 A 0.0141 A 0.23 A
Wild 1 Y-7124 0.018 C 0.0050 B 0.13 BC
Acetic acid (g/L)
5 0.043 A 0.0126 A 0.24 A
10 0.028 B 0.0071 B 0.17 B
15 0.014 C 0.0032 C 0.10 C

aRates are normalized relative to population density in absorbance units (A) at 620 nm.

bParameter variations based on two-way ANOVA (isolate × acetic ) were significant (P < 0.001). Within columns, values with no letters in common are significantly different at P < 0.05 (Student-Newman-Keuls pairwise method).