Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 26;5(1):94–102. doi: 10.1556/EUJMI-D-14-00040

Table 1.

Inhibition as observed after EZ1-based nucleic acid extraction and after column-based nucleic acid extraction for various applied PCR test kits. The in-house malaria PCR did not include an internal inhibition-control approach

Applied PCR kit Number of analyzed samples (n) Inhibition after EZ1 extraction only (n) Inhibition after column-based extraction only (n) Inhibition after both extraction schemes (n)
Malaria PCR Kit 1.0 (altona DIAGNOSTICS) 48  4 0 0
In-house real-time multiplex PCR for enteroinvasive bacteria according to [30, 31] 81  7 0 1
ETEC-EIEC kit (RidaGene) 81  0 0 1
EHEC-EPEC kit (RidaGene) 81  0 0 1
EAEC kit (RidaGene) 81  1 0 1
In-house real-time multiplex PCR for enteropathogenic protozoa according to [3234] 81 10 0 2
Viral gastroenteritis kit (Fast-track Diagnostics) 81  0 0 0