Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 28;15:61. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0433-x

Table 3.

Binary logistic regression modelling

Omnibus test df = 1 Cox & Snell Nagelkerke Correctly classified B SE Wald df = 1 Odds ratio/Exp (B) 95% CI of odds ratio
X 2 p R 2 R 2 % X 2 p Lower Upper
Outcome: Positive moves
MODEL 1 8.7 0.003 0.139 0.187 65.5
DUNDRUM-3 clinician rated −0.124 0.045 7.55 0.006 0.884 0.809 0.965
Constant 1.725 0.753 5.25 0.022 5.614
MODEL 2, add HCR-20 (C + R) 15.7 0.001 0.237 0.317 75.9
HCR-20 (C + R) −0.264 0.078 11.33 0.001 0.768 0.659 0.896
Constant 1.423 0.543 6.87 0.009 4.149
Outcome: Negative moves
MODEL 3 9.06 0.003 0.145 0.262 86.2
DUNDRUM-4 clinician-patient difference 0.319 0.125 6.54 0.011 1.375 1.077 1.756
Constant −4.730 1.347 12.33 0.001 0.009
MODEL 4, add HCR-20 (C + R) 9.06 0.003 0.145 0.262 86.2
DUNDRUM-4 clinician-patient difference 0.319 0.125 6.54 0.011 1.375 1.077 1.756
Constant −4.730 1.347 12.33 0.001 0.009
Outcome: Conditional discharge
MODEL 5 26.2 0.001 0.336 0.604 95.3
DUNDRUM-3 clinician rated −0.553 0.214 6.69 0.010 0.575 0.378 0.875
Constant 3.965 1.864 4.53 0.033 52.737
MODEL 6 add HCR-20 (C + R) 26.2 0.001 0.336 0.604 95.3
DUNDRUM-3 clinician rated −0.553 0.214 6.69 0.010 0.575 0.378 0.875
Constant 3.965 1.864 4.53 0.033 52.737

All models include clinician rated DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4, patient self-rated DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 and the differences between pairs. Models 2, 4 and 6 also include the HCR-20 (C + R) dynamic score. All models: forward stepwise likelihood ratio.