APPENDIX 1.
Confirmatory Factor Analyses for Dependent Variables
| Factor Loadingsa |
||
|---|---|---|
| Scale/Subscale/Item | Baseline | Follow-up |
| Barriers to Research Utilization Scale (BRUS) | ||
| Organizational Support (α = .90; .91)2,3 | ||
| The correctional administration supports implementation of the HIV services continuum. | 0.75 | 0.80 |
| The medical provider administration supports implementation of the HIV services continuum. | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| The treatment contractor administration supports implementation of the HIV services continuum. | 0.68 | 0.53 |
| Local community based organizations' administration supports implementation of the HIV services continuum. |
0.61 | 0.60 |
| Correctional staff is supportive of the implementation of the HIV services continuum. | 0.55 | 0.76 |
| Medical staff is supportive of the implementation of the HIV services continuum. | 0.71 | 0.82 |
| Treatment staff is supportive of the implementation of the HIV services continuum. | 0.73 | 0.74 |
| Community organization staff is supportive of the implementation of the HIV services continuum. |
0.54 | 0.63 |
| Usage Rating Profile (URP) | ||
| Acceptability (α = .92; .95) b | ||
| I like the procedures used in the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision. |
0.52 | 0.68 |
| The modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision are a good way to address people under criminal justice supervision’s HIV issues. |
0.64 | 0.66 |
| I am not interested in implementing the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision. (R) |
0.60 | 0.49 |
| I am resistant to use the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision. |
0.48 | 0.50 |
| This is an acceptable intervention strategy for dealing with HIV issues for people under criminal justice supervision. |
0.58 | 0.64 |
| I have positive attitudes about implementing the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision. |
0.56 | 0.67 |
| Overall, the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision are beneficial to the people under criminal justice supervision. |
0.61 | 0.79 |
| I am motivated to try the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision. | 0.52 | 0.61 |
| The modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision are reasonable for their HIV issues. |
0.56 | 0.80 |
| The modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision are an effective choice for dealing with a lot of HIV issues. | 0.59 | 0.83 |
| I will implement the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision with a good deal of enthusiasm. | 0.57 | 0.63 |
| The modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision are a fair way to handle their HIV issues. | 0.55 | 0.74 |
| Use of the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision will save time dealing with their HIV issues. | 0.39 | 0.60 |
| Feasibility (α = .89; .94) b | ||
| The amount of time for record keeping associated with the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision is reasonable. |
0.49 | 0.65 |
| The modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision could be implemented for the duration of time as prescribed. |
0.65 | 0.70 |
| The modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision could be implemented with the intensity as prescribed. |
0.61 | 0.74 |
| The amount of time to use the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision is reasonable. |
0.60 | 0.76 |
| The modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision could be implemented as frequently as described. |
0.53 | 0.81 |
| The modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision will not be disruptive to other offenders. |
0.45 | 0.63 |
| All pieces of the modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision can be implemented precisely. |
0.39 | 0.59 |
| The modified HIV services for people under criminal justice supervision can be implemented exactly as described. |
0.37 | 0.59 |
(R) following an item indicates it was reverse coded before it was included in its corresponding subscale score.
a
Factor loadings are the STD standardized coefficients from the Mplus output. Results from the baseline data are presented first, followed by results from the follow-up data.
b
Alphas are reported for baseline and follow-up, respectively.