. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 15.

Published in final edited form as: Vasc Med. 2011 Jun 27;16(4):267–274. doi: 10.1177/1358863X11411361

Table 3.

Pearson's Correlations (P) of FMD with measures of shear rate^a in 50 Participants with Type 2 Diabetes

	Overall (n=50)	Responders only (n=41)	With adjustment for resting brachial diameter (n=50)	With subtraction of baseline shear from SR_AUC (n=50)
SR_{AUC 0-30}, s⁻¹, ×10³	0.576 (<0.001)	0.572 (<0.001)	0.489 (<0.001)	0.515 (<0.001)
SR_{AUC 0-60}, s⁻¹ ×10³	0.529 (<0.001)	0.516 (<0.001)	0.434 (0.002)	0.420 (0.004)
SR_{AUC 0-ttp}, s⁻¹ ×10³	N/A^b	0.517 (<0.001)	0.471 (<0.001)^b	0.412 (0.010)^b
SR_peak, s⁻¹ ×10³	0.512 (<0.001)	0.569 (<0.001)	0.390 (0.006)	N/A^c

Data presented as P

All measures of shear rate were log transformed

N/A in 9 participants classified as non-responders

N/A based on formula used to calculate SR_peak