Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0118785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118785

Table 3. Comparative efficiencies of crickets and selected livestock.

A. domesticus Carp 1 Chicken Pork 1 Beef 1
PF FW1
Feed conversion (kg dry feed / kg live weight) 1.3 1.8 1.5 1.7 2 –2.3 1 5.9 12.7
Feed conversion (kg dry feed / kg edible weight) 1.7 3 2.3 3 2.3 2.4 4 –4.2 1 10.7 31.7
Protein content (% of edible weight) 16 16 18 20 1 14 15
Protein conversion efficiency (%) 35 23 30 33 4 –25 1 13 5

Feed conversion ratios, protein content, and protein conversion efficiency for A. domesticus in the Poultry Feed-PF and Food Waste 1-FW1 treatments as well as for carp, chicken, pork and beef.

1. Smil [42].

2. Feddes et al. [43].

3. Using 80% edible portion, as in Nakagaki et al. [8].

4. Using 70% dressing percentage (harvestable portion) [44] instead of 55% used by Smil [42] and the feed conversion reported by Feddes et al. [43].