Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0122106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122106

Table 1. Univariate analysis of clinico-pathological parameters influencing tumour-specific survival in the group of grade a 1 and 2 breast tumours.

Parameter Tumour-specific survival
  n events P-value b
AGR3 protein expression c
AGR3low 40 9
AGR3high 64 31 0.02
Age at diagnosis
<54,5 years 52 13
≥54,5 years 52 27 0.002
Tumour size d
pT1 44 8
pT2-4 59 31 <0.001
Lymph node status d
pN0 53 14
pN1-3 47 22 0.016
Histological type
invasive ductal 92 35
invasive lobular 5 3 0.165
Oestrogen receptor status
negative (IRS e 0–2) 15 6
positive (IRS e 3–12) 59 21 0.636
Progesterone receptor status
negative (IRS e 0–2) 45 20
positive (IRS e 3–12) 39 12 0.108
HER2 status f
negative (0; 1+; 2+) 75 31
positive (3+) 12 2 0.270

aAccording to Bloom and Richardson, as modified by Elston and Ellis [32].

bLog-rank test at the two-sided significance level of 0.05.

cMedian immunoreactive score (IRS) according to Remmele and Stegner [30] was used as cut-off: AGR3 low (IRS 0–4), AGR3 high (IRS 6–12).

dAccording to TNM classification by Sobin and Wittekind [58].

eImmunoreactive score (IRS) according to Remmele and Stegner [30].

fOverexpression of the ERBB2 gene (Her-2/neu) was diagnosed analogously to the threshold of the DAKO-Score system based on IHC assay. Significant P-values are marked in bold face.