Table 5. This is the Table 5. Comparison of 24/7 local access to equipment in rural EDs.

	Quebec (n = 26)	Ontario (n = 62)	p-Value *
Ultrasound	30% (n = 7/23) **	46% (n = 28/61) ***	0.2249
Bedside ultrasound	81% (n = 21/26)	63% (n = 39/62)	0.1340
CT scanner	77% (n = 20/26)	15% (n = 9/62)	<.0001
Laboratory	100% (n = 26/26)	94% (n = 58/62)	0.3148
Magnetic resonance imaging	0% (n = 0/26)	0% (n = 0/61)
Basic X-rays	92% (n = 24/26)	92% (n = 57/62)	1.000

^** The proportions were calculated for 23 EDs because of 3 missing value.

^*** The proportions were calculated for 61 EDs because of 1 missing value.

^* p-Value from Fisher exact test.