Abstract
AIM: To investigate the frequency and distribution of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) and uridine 5’-diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 (UGT1A7) genes in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD).
METHODS: Frequencies and distributions of NAT2 and UGT1A7 SNPs as well as their haplotypes were investigated in 95 patients with UC, 60 patients with CD, and 200 gender-matched, unrelated, healthy, control volunteers by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), PCR-denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), and direct DNA sequencing.
RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the frequency of haplotype, NAT2*7B, significantly increased in CD patients, compared to that in controls (P = 0.0130, OR = 2.802, 95%CI = 1.243-6.316). However, there was no association between NAT2 haplotypes and UC, or between any UGT1A7 haplotypes and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
CONCLUSION: It is likely that the NAT2 gene is one of the determinants for CD in Japanese. Alternatively, a new CD determinant may exist in the 8p22 region, where NAT2 is located.
Keywords: Crohn’s disease, N-acetyltransferase 2 gene, Polymorphism, Disease-susceptible gene, Association study, Japanese population
INTRODUCTION
Chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multi-factorial disorder characterized by non-specific inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract with an increase in the permeability to xenobiotics in the intestinal mucosa, finally resulting in intestinal malabsorption and immune defense abnormalities[1,2]. Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are the major forms of IBD. Although the precise etiology of IBD remains unknown, not only several environmental factors, such as dietary components and microorganisms, but also genetic factors may contribute to the occurrence of this disorder[3,4]. Recently, extensive molecular genetic studies have been launched to identify genes underlying the etiology[5]. One of them is the caspase activating recruitment domain 15/nucleotide oligomerization domain 2 gene (CARD15/NOD2) located at 16q12. Although mutations in NOD2 are observed frequently in Caucasian patients with CD, but not with UC[6,7], they have rarely been found in Japanese CD patients[8,9], suggesting that NOD2 is not a major determinant for CD in Japanese.
We have particularly focused on genes for N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) and uridine 5’-diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 (UGT1A7) as candidates susceptible to IBD, because they are expressed in the gastrointestinal tract and play a role in biochemical barriers against internal and external xenobiotics[10-12]. Diminution or disturbance of these barriers might result in increased permeability to xenobiotics in the gastrointestinal tract, and subsequently their accumulation in the body, probably leading to the development of IBD. N-acetyltransferases (NATs) are the enzymes catalyzing N-acetylation (deactivation) of a variety of carbocyclic and heterocyclic arylamines by means of transferring acetyl-CoA to the amino or hydroxyl side chain of arylamines in metabolism of the phase II reaction[10]. NATs are encoded by two genes, NAT1 and NAT2, both are located at 8p22. NAT1 is ubiquitously expressed, while the expression of NAT2 is confined to the gastrointestinal tract and liver[10]. The UDP-glucuronosyl-transferase 1 family genes located at 2q37 consist of nine functional genes, UGT1A1, UGT1A3-10, which catalyze the glucuronidation of small lipophilic agents by means of conversion of hydrophobic substrates to inactive hydrophilic UDP-glucuronides, and are expressed in a tissue-specific fashion in the gastrointestinal tract and liver. In particular, UGT1A7 is expressed exclusively in the gastrointestinal tract and lung, but not in the liver[13-15]. The degree of metabolism with regard to both NAT2 and UGT1A7 varies among individuals, suggesting the presence of genetic variations contributing to the metabolic activation capacity. Current studies have shown an association between NAT2 or UGT1A7 polymorphisms and various diseases, i.e., systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus[16], drug toxicity[17,18], orolaryngeal cancer[19], esophageal cancer[20], colorectal cancer[21,22], pancreas cancer[23], hepatocellular carcinoma[15,24], or bladder cancer[25].
Here we report the results of studies on association between NAT2 or UGT1A7 and IBD in Japanese using six and three polymorphic haplotypes in the two genes, respectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
The subjects studied comprised 95 patients with UC, 60 patients with CD, and 200 gender-matched, unrelated, healthy volunteers, and were further characterized as listed in Table 1. All participants were Japanese, who were randomly recruited from eight general health clinics in the Nagasaki area in Japan. The study protocol was approved by the Committee for the Ethical Issue on Human Genome and Gene Analysis in Nagasaki University, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Diagnosis of IBD was made according to endoscopic, radiological, histological, and clinical criteria provided by both the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences in WHO and the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease[26-28]. Patients with indeterminate colitis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or other recognized autoimmune diseases were excluded from the subjects studied.
Table 1.
Disease |
|||
Characteristic | UC | CD | Control |
Number of subjects | 95 | 60 | 200 |
Age range (yr) | 14–83 | 17–75 | 20–60 |
Age (mean±SD) | 44.4±16.4b | 35.0±12.6 | 32.5±11.1 |
Male/female (%) | 53 (55.8)/42 (44.2) | 35 (58.3)/25 (41.7) | 125 (62.5)/75 (37.5) |
P<0.01 vs control.
Determination of NAT2 polymorphisms
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral whole blood of each individual using the DNA Extractor WB-rapid Kit (Wako, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of NAT2 deposited in SNP-database[29] were determined with the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method using primer pairs and protocol described by Leff et al[30]. The PCR-RFLP method was modified in order to distinguish among all known NAT2 SNPs[29]. In brief, polymorphic region in NAT2 was amplified by PCR with a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using 250 ng of genomic DNA in a 50-µL reaction containing 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mmol/L KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L each dNTP, 500 ng of forward primer: 5’-GGCTATAA-GAACTCTAGGAAC-3’, 500 ng of reverse primer: 5’-AAGGGTTTATTTTGTTCCTTATTCTAAAT-3’, and 2.0 U Taq DNA polymerase. The amplification protocol comprised initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR product of 896 bp was digested by restriction enzymes (TaKaRa Biomedical, Shiga, Japan). Three SNPs, C190T, G191A, and A434C, were detected by digestion with MspI. Likewise, C282T, C481T, or G857A was detected by digestion with FokI, KpnI, or BamHI, respectively. T111C, G590A, and C759T were detected by digestion with TaqI. These fragments were subjected to electrophoresis on 2% agarose or 5% polyacrylamide gel, and visualized with UV transilluminator (Alpha Innotech, CA, USA) after ethidium bromide staining. Moreover, T341C, A803G, and A845C were detected by further nested PCR. Amplified NAT2 product (1 µL) was used as a template in a 25-µL reaction containing 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mmol/L KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L each dNTP, 250 ng of forward primer: 5’-CACCTTCT-CCTGCAGGTGACCG-3’ and reverse primer: 5’-TGTCAAGCAGAAAATGCAAGGC-3’ for T341C and A803G, or 250 ng of forward primer: 5’-TGAGGAA-GAGGTTGAAGAAGTGCT-3’ and reverse primer: 5’-AAGGGTTTATTTTGTTCCTTATTCTAAAT-3’ for A845C, and 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase. The amplification protocol comprised initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 62 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The former nested PCR products were digested with AciI and DdeI (New England BioLabs Inc., MA, USA) to detect T341C and A803G, respectively. The latter products were digested with DraIII (New England BioLabs Inc.) to detect A845C. All these products were subjected to electrophoresis on 6% polyacrylamide gel, and visualized as described above.
Determination of UGT1A7 polymorphisms
Four SNPs have been known within UGT1A7-exon 1[15]. A SNP at codon 11 is a silent mutation. SNPs at codons 129 and 131 lying in a linkage disequilibrium (LD) block were detected by PCR-denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) with an automated HPLC instrument (WAVETM, Transgenomic, CA, USA), and by direct DNA sequencing with ABI 310 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). A DNA fragment containing codons 129 and 131 was amplified by PCR using 125 ng of genomic DNA in a 25-µL reaction containing 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mmol/L KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L each dNTP, 500 ng of forward primer: 5’-CCGGGAGT-TCATGGTTTTT-3’, 250 ng of reverse primer: 5’-CACAGAGGGGAGGGAGAAAT-3’, and 1.0 U Taq DNA polymerase, generating a 260-bp fragment. Amplification protocol comprised initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were used for DHPLC analysis. The temperature required for successful resolution of heteroduplex molecules was determined to be 56.8 °C according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Another SNP at codon 208 was detected by PCR-RFLP using primer pair of 5’-GCATGAGGTGGTCGTCGTCA-3’/5’-CATCACGGGTTTGGGATACT-3’, as in the NAT2 SNP-detection. After digestion of PCR products by RsaI (Promega, WI, USA), the fragments were subjected to electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel, and visualized as described above.
Statistical analysis
Gender and age value among the subjects were evaluated by χ2 test and unpaired Student’s t test, respectively. Allele frequencies were estimated by the gene-counting method, and χ2 test was used to identify significant departures from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Subsequently, the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated by multiple logistic regression analysis using the JMP program package (version 5, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and the StatView program package (version 5, SAS Institute). Haplotype and genotype frequencies were compared between individuals with and without haplotype or genotype, using χ2 test. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Haplotype frequencies of NAT2
We identified six haplotypes composed of six SNPs among the subjects examined (Table 2). The haplotype “NAT2*4” comprising 69.5% of controls was wild-type, while five other haplotypes were variants. Distributions of the haplotypes in our study population were well corresponded to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Table 2). The results implied that the population we studied had a homogeneous genetic background, being consistent with the previous observations[31-33]. However, since the frequencies of three haplotypes, NAT2*5B, NAT2*11, and NAT2*13, were very low, they were not considered for subsequent multiple logistic regression analysis.
Table 2.
Haplotype | SNP |
Number (%) of subjects with haplotype |
||
UC (allele = 190) | CD (allele = 120) | Control (allele = 400) | ||
NAT2*4 | None | 122 (64.2) | 77 (64.2) | 278 (69.5) |
NAT2*5B | T341C, C481T, A803G | 3 (1.6) | 1 (0.8) | 2 (0.5) |
NAT2*6A | C282T, G590A | 43 (22.6) | 21 (17.5) | 79 (19.75) |
NAT2*7B | C282T, G857A | 20 (10.5) | 18 (15.0) | 35 (8.75) |
NAT2*11 | C481T | 0 (0) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (0.25) |
NAT2*13 | C282T | 2 (1.1) | 2 (1.7) | 5 (1.25) |
The frequency of haplotype “NAT2*7B” composed of two SNPs (C282T and G857A) significantly increased in patients with CD, compared to that in controls (P = 0.0130, OR = 2.802, 95%CI: 1.243-6.316, Table 3). In contrast, there was no difference in frequency of NAT2*7B between patients with UC and controls (P = 0.3338, OR = 1.436, 95%CI: 0.689-2.992). Of the 60 CD patients, 17 (28.3%) had NAT2*7B, the incidence being significantly higher than that (32/200, 16.0%) in controls (P = 0.032, OR = 2.076, Table 4). These results indicated that the haplotype NAT2*7B was associated with the susceptibility to CD, but not to UC.
Table 3.
Haplotype | P | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval |
UC patients vs controls | |||
NAT2*4 | 0.6823 | 0.809 | 0.293–2.232 |
NAT2*6A | 0.5621 | 1.183 | 0.671–2.084 |
NAT2*7B | 0.3338 | 1.436 | 0.689–2.992 |
CD patients vs controls | |||
NAT2*4 | 0.2616 | 2.162 | 0.563–8.304 |
NAT2*6A | 0.3898 | 1.349 | 0.682–2.670 |
NAT2*7B | 0.013 | 2.802 | 1.243–6.316 |
Table 4.
NAT2*7B | UC (n = 95, %) | CD (n = 60, %) | Control (n = 200, %) |
Presence | 19 (20.0) | 17 (28.3) | 32 (16.0) |
Absence | 76 (80.0) | 43 (71.7) | 168 (84.0) |
CD patients vs controls: P = 0.032, OR = 2.076.
Cascorbi et al[34], and Gross et al[35], have shown a relationship between genotypes of NAT2 polymorphism and phenotypes. The haplotypes NAT2*4, NAT2*11, and NAT2*13, code for the rapid acetylator phenotype, while NAT2*5B, NAT2*6A, and NAT2*7B, code for the slow acetylators. According to their reports, we divided the subjects in to two groups: the rapid acetylators comprised homozygous and heterozygous carriers of the haplotypes NAT2*4, NAT2*11, or NAT2*13 and the slow acetylators comprised all homozygous carriers of the other haplotypes. The frequency and distribution were compared between these groups, but there were no significant differences in frequencies of these estimated phenotypes among patients with UC, CD, and controls (data not shown).
Haplotype frequencies of UGT1A7
We detected two SNPs at codons 129 and 131 of UGT1A7 by DHPLC with 100% accuracy, as confirmed by direct DNA sequencing. Subsequently, on the basis of the results by PCR-DHPLC and PCR-RFLP, three haplotypes, UGT1A7*1, UGT1A7*2, and UGT1A7*3, were determined in the Japanese population studied (Table 5). The UGT1A7*1 haplotype was wild-type, UGT1A7*2 and UGT1A7*3 were identified as variants, while another haplotype, UGT1A*4, was not observed, indicating that it was very rare in Japanese. There were no significant differences in frequencies of haplotypes and genotypes among patients UC, CD, and controls (data not shown).
Table 5.
Haplotype | SNP |
Number (%) of subjects with haplotype |
||
UC (allele = 190) | CD (allele = 120) | Control (allele = 400) | ||
UGT1A7*1 | None | 120 (63.2) | 69 (57.5) | 242 (60.5) |
UGT1A7*2 | T387G, C391A, G392A | 29 (15.3) | 24 (20.0) | 55 (13.8) |
UGT1A7*3 | T387G, C391A, G392A, | 41 (21.6) | 27 (22.5) | 103 (25.7) |
T622C | ||||
UGT1A7*4 | T622C | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
DISCUSSION
We have shown that a NAT2 haplotype, NAT2*7B, is associated with CD, and thus, NAT2 could be one of the genetic factors for the predisposition to the onset and/or development of CD, although its contribution to this disease appears relatively small. In contrast, we could not find any association between UGT1A7 polymorphism and IBD, suggesting that UGT1A7 never confers to these diseases. Although there are previous reports demonstrating an association between certain NAT2 variants and diseases, they deal with phenotypical variations, such as rapid, intermediate, and slow acetylators in different conditions such as systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and drug-induced agranulocytosis[16,17]. Therefore, the present study is the first report documenting an association between NAT2 genetic variation and CD.
Three NAT2 haplotypes, NAT2*5B, NAT2*6A, and NAT2*7B, are estimated to show slow acetylator phenotypes[34,35]. The present study showed that slow acetylator carrying these haplotypes was not associated, with CD (data not shown). Although a role of the NAT2*7B haplotype in the susceptibility to CD is unknown, Fretland et al[36], demonstrated, that this haplotype is functionally related to low activity of N-acetylation. It is likely, that low activity of N-acetylation due to NAT2*7B might fail to metabolite xenobiotics in the state of increased permeability in the gastrointestinal tract and subsequently accumulates them in the body since NAT2 functions as a biochemical barrier against xenobiotics including dietary intake, intestinal bacteria, and toxins[10-12,15]. Our hypothesis may be partly supported by clinical evidence that total parenteral nutrition and elemental diet placing the gastrointestinal tract “at rest” can successfully improve CD, and refeeding by oral conventional diet aggravates the activity of CD[37].
Recent genome-wide linkage analyses and candidate gene-based association studies have shown possible IBD susceptibility regions at 16q12 (IBD1), 12p13 (IBD2), 6p21 (IBD3), 14q11 (IBD4), 19p13 (IBD5), 5q31-q33 (IBD6), 1p36 (IBD7), and at 16p (IBD8)[5,38,39]. Our results indicate the existence of a new CD determinant at an LD region of 8p22, even if it is not NAT2 it-self. It remains to be confirmed whether the association is reproducible in larger Japanese samples as well as in other populations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to physicians, patients, and volunteers for participating in this study. We thank Miss Naoko Sakemi, Dr. Hiroshi Soda, and Professor Norio Niikawa for their support.
Footnotes
Science Editor Wang XL and Guo SY Language Editor Elsevier HK
References
- 1.Fiocchi C. Inflammatory bowel disease: etiology and pathogenesis. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:182–205. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70381-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Farrell RJ, Peppercorn MA. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2002;359:331–340. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07499-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yang H, Taylor KD, Rotter JI. Inflammatory bowel disease. I. Genetic epidemiology. Mol Genet Metab. 2001;74:1–21. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2001.3199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Watts DA, Satsangi J. The genetic jigsaw of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2002;50 Suppl 3:III31–III36. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.suppl_3.iii31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Taylor KD, Yang H, Rotter JI. Inflammatory bowel disease. II. Gene mapping. Mol Genet Metab. 2001;74:22–44. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2001.3214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hugot JP, Chamaillard M, Zouali H, Lesage S, Cézard JP, Belaiche J, Almer S, Tysk C, O'Morain CA, Gassull M, et al. Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature. 2001;411:599–603. doi: 10.1038/35079107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ogura Y, Bonen DK, Inohara N, Nicolae DL, Chen FF, Ramos R, Britton H, Moran T, Karaliuskas R, Duerr RH, et al. A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature. 2001;411:603–606. doi: 10.1038/35079114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Inoue N, Tamura K, Kinouchi Y, Fukuda Y, Takahashi S, Ogura Y, Inohara N, Núñez G, Kishi Y, Koike Y, et al. Lack of common NOD2 variants in Japanese patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:86–91. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.34155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yamazaki K, Takazoe M, Tanaka T, Kazumori T, Nakamura Y. Absence of mutation in the NOD2/CARD15 gene among 483 Japanese patients with Crohn's disease. J Hum Genet. 2002;47:469–472. doi: 10.1007/s100380200067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hein DW, Doll MA, Rustan TD, Gray K, Feng Y, Ferguson RJ, Grant DM. Metabolic activation and deactivation of arylamine carcinogens by recombinant human NAT1 and polymorphic NAT2 acetyltransferases. Carcinogenesis. 1993;14:1633–1638. doi: 10.1093/carcin/14.8.1633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Turesky RJ, Lang NP, Butler MA, Teitel CH, Kadlubar FF. Metabolic activation of carcinogenic heterocyclic aromatic amines by human liver and colon. Carcinogenesis. 1991;12:1839–1845. doi: 10.1093/carcin/12.10.1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tukey RH, Strassburg CP. Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression, and disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000;40:581–616. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Strassburg CP, Kneip S, Topp J, Obermayer-Straub P, Barut A, Tukey RH, Manns MP. Polymorphic gene regulation and interindividual variation of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity in human small intestine. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36164–36171. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002180200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tukey RH, Strassburg CP. Genetic multiplicity of the human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and regulation in the gastrointestinal tract. Mol Pharmacol. 2001;59:405–414. doi: 10.1124/mol.59.3.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vogel A, Kneip S, Barut A, Ehmer U, Tukey RH, Manns MP, Strassburg CP. Genetic link of hepatocellular carcinoma with polymorphisms of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A7 gene. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1136–1144. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.28655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.von Schmiedeberg S, Fritsche E, Rönnau AC, Specker C, Golka K, Richter-Hintz D, Schuppe HC, Lehmann P, Ruzicka T, Esser C, et al. Polymorphisms of the xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes CYP1A1 and NAT-2 in systemic sclerosis and lupus erythematosus. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;455:147–152. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4857-7_21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wadelius M, Stjernberg E, Wiholm BE, Rane A. Polymorphisms of NAT2 in relation to sulphasalazine-induced agranulocytosis. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10:35–41. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200002000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huang YS, Chern HD, Su WJ, Wu JC, Lai SL, Yang SY, Chang FY, Lee SD. Polymorphism of the N-acetyltransferase 2 gene as a susceptibility risk factor for antituberculosis drug-induced hepatitis. Hepatology. 2002;35:883–889. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.32102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zheng Z, Park JY, Guillemette C, Schantz SP, Lazarus P. Tobacco carcinogen-detoxifying enzyme UGT1A7 and its association with orolaryngeal cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1411–1418. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.18.1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Strassburg CP, Strassburg A, Nguyen N, Li Q, Manns MP, Tukey RH. Regulation and function of family 1 and family 2 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase genes (UGT1A, UGT2B) in human oesophagus. Biochem J. 1999;338(Pt2):489–498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brockton N, Little J, Sharp L, Cotton SC. N-acetyltransferase polymorphisms and colorectal cancer: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:846–861. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Strassburg CP, Vogel A, Kneip S, Tukey RH, Manns MP. Polymorphisms of the human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A7 gene in colorectal cancer. Gut. 2002;50:851–856. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.6.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ockenga J, Vogel A, Teich N, Keim V, Manns MP, Strassburg CP. UDP glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A7) gene polymorphisms increase the risk of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1802–1808. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00294-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang YS, Chern HD, Wu JC, Chao Y, Huang YH, Chang FY, Lee SD. Polymorphism of the N-acetyltransferase 2 gene, red meat intake, and the susceptibility of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1417–1422. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Risch A, Wallace DM, Bathers S, Sim E. Slow N-acetylation genotype is a susceptibility factor in occupational and smoking related bladder cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:231–236. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.2.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Podolsky DK. Inflammatory bowel disease (1) N Engl J Med. 1991;325:928–937. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109263251306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Podolsky DK. Inflammatory bowel disease (2) N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1008–1016. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199110033251406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lennard-Jones JE. Classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1989;170:2–6; discussion 16-9. doi: 10.3109/00365528909091339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Available from: http: //www.louisville.edu/medschool/pharmacology/NAT2.html/
- 30.Leff MA, Fretland AJ, Doll MA, Hein DW. Novel human N-acetyltransferase 2 alleles that differ in mechanism for slow acetylator phenotype. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:34519–34522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.49.34519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sekine A, Saito S, Iida A, Mitsunobu Y, Higuchi S, Harigae S, Nakamura Y. Identification of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of human N-acetyltransferase genes NAT1, NAT2, AANAT, ARD1 and L1CAM in the Japanese population. J Hum Genet. 2001;46:314–319. doi: 10.1007/s100380170065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yokogawa K, Nakaharu T, Ishizaki J, Ozaki E, Takeda Y, Mabuchi H, Matsushita R, Kimura K, Nakashima E, Ichimura F, et al. Kinetic phenotypic diagnosis of N-acetylation polymorphism in patients based on ratio of urinary metabolites of salicylazosulfapyridine. Int J Pharm. 2001;229:183–191. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00864-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ando M, Ando Y, Sekido Y, Ando M, Shimokata K, Hasegawa Y. Genetic polymorphisms of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 gene and irinotecan toxicity in Japanese cancer patients. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2002;93:591–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2002.tb01295.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cascorbi I, Drakoulis N, Brockmöller J, Maurer A, Sperling K, Roots I. Arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT2) mutations and their allelic linkage in unrelated Caucasian individuals: correlation with phenotypic activity. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57:581–592. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gross M, Kruisselbrink T, Anderson K, Lang N, McGovern P, Delongchamp R, Kadlubar F. Distribution and concordance of N-acetyltransferase genotype and phenotype in an American population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:683–692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fretland AJ, Leff MA, Doll MA, Hein DW. Functional characterization of human N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) single nucleotide polymorphisms. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11:207–215. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200104000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Glickman RM. Inflammatory bowel diseases: ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. In: Isselbacher KJ, Braunwald E, Wilson JD, eds , editors. Harrison's principles of internal medicine, 13th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1994. pp. 1403–1417. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cho JH, Nicolae DL, Ramos R, Fields CT, Rabenau K, Corradino S, Brant SR, Espinosa R, LeBeau M, Hanauer SB, et al. Linkage and linkage disequilibrium in chromosome band 1p36 in American Chaldeans with inflammatory bowel disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:1425–1432. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.9.1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hampe J, Frenzel H, Mirza MM, Croucher PJ, Cuthbert A, Mascheretti S, Huse K, Platzer M, Bridger S, Meyer B, et al. Evidence for a NOD2-independent susceptibility locus for inflammatory bowel disease on chromosome 16p. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:321–326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.261567999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]