Skip to main content
. 2005 Aug 21;11(31):4833–4837. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i31.4833

Table 3.

Comparisons of frequencies of NAT2-haplotypes among study subjects by multiple logistic regression analysis

Haplotype P Odds ratio 95% confidence interval
UC patients vs controls
NAT2*4 0.6823 0.809 0.293–2.232
NAT2*6A 0.5621 1.183 0.671–2.084
NAT2*7B 0.3338 1.436 0.689–2.992
CD patients vs controls
NAT2*4 0.2616 2.162 0.563–8.304
NAT2*6A 0.3898 1.349 0.682–2.670
NAT2*7B 0.013 2.802 1.243–6.316