Table 3.

Laser goniopuncture rates for deep sclerectomy.

Author	Procedure	n	Mean LGP rate (%)	Mean LGP timing (months)	Mean preLGP IOP (mmHg)	Mean postLGP IOP (mmHg)	Reduction in IOP
Khairy et al.18	DS	43	4.6	NA	NA	NA	NA
El Sayyad et al.32	DS	39	10.3	9.6	NA	NA	7.4 mmHg
Shaarawy33	DS	52	40	23.7	23.6	16.7	29%
Wishart et al.34	DS	52	19	20.6	33.5	20.6	38.5%
Devloo et al.25	DS	69	30	NA	23.75	16	29.42%
Shaarawy & Mermoud26	DS	26	46	13.2	19.5	14.7	NA
Mousa11	DS + implant	20	45	NA	NA	NA	NA
Bissig et al.15	DS + implant	105	59.8	29	19.8	12	39.4%
Mermoud et al.14	DS + implant	100	41	9.9	22.2	12.5	NA
Shaarawy19	DS + implant	105	51	21	20	11	45%
Jehn et al.35	DS + implant	27	30	NA	NA	NA	NA
Devloo et al.25	DS + implant	24	50	NA	25.63	15.75	37.03%
Shaarawy & Mermoud26	DS + implant	26	46	14.5	22	7.3	NA
Ates et al.36	DS + implant	54	5.5	NA	NA	NA	NA
Drolsum37	DS + implant	29	44.8	NA	NA	NA	NA
Ravinet et al.38	DS + implant	22	50	10	NA	NA	5.1 mmHg
Hamel et al.39	DS + implant	21	71.4	NA	20.3	11.5	43.3%
Lachkar et al.27	DS + implant	157	47.3	NA	NA	NA	NA
Ates et al.40	DS + implant	23	13	NA	NA	NA	NA
Mermoud et al.41	DS + implant	44	23	9.1	21.0	12.0	NA
Wevill et al.42	DS + implant	17	22	1	NA	NA	NA
Anand and Atherley43	DS + implant	19	81	NA	NA	NA	NA
Anand and Pilling20	DS + implant ± MMC	258	67	10.3	19.6	14.3	NA
Ollikainen et al.24	DS + implant + MMC	31a	29	NA	24.4	12.9	NA
Ollikainen et al.24	DS + implant + MMC	37b	55.6	NA	26.2	10.6
Anand & Atherley43	DS + implant + MMC	52	45	NA	NA	NA	NA
Mendrinos et al.44	DS + implant ± MMC	22	63.6	16.6	21.8	9	NA
Lachkar et al.27	DS + 5-FU	90	46.9	NA	NA	NA	NA

n: number of eyes in the study; LGP: Laser goniopuncture; IOP: Intraocular pressure; DS: Deep Sclerectomy; MMC: Mitomycin C.

^aEyes with primary open angle glaucoma.

^bEyes with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma.