Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 16.
Published in final edited form as: Anim Behav. 2014 Apr 1;90:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.007

Table 3.

Number of successful subjects and percentages of trials in which subjects succeeded in waiting, given per delay condition

Task Delay condition
Overall performance
2 s 5 s 10 s 20 s 40 s 60 s 80 s 160 s 320 s 640 s
1 exchange 10 9 8 7 2 nt 1 1 1 1 Successful subjects
 1A quality (%) 57.62 29.63 16.67 18.10 23.81 nt 28.57 14.29 9.52 4.76 40.07
 1B quantity (%) 18.74 8.61 1.37 1.11 0.00 nt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.49
2 accumulation 12 10 6 3 3 2 2 1 1 Successful subjects
 2A quality (%) 57.29 39.77 65.00 50.00 25.00 37.50 50.00 37.50 50.00 48.44
 2B quantity (%) 9.11 3.68 1.25 4.69 5.21 1.56 0.00 0.00 3.13 4.91

nt = not tested; the 60 s delay condition was tested only in the accumulation task. The conditions reported are those where one subject waited at least once.