. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;8(4):10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002673 e002673. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002673

Table 4.

Assessment of repeatability in healthy subjects and patients with PAD.

Healthy subjects – Intra-session
	Scan 1	Scan 2	ICC	CV_W

Leg Peak Perfusion (mL/min/100g)	51.5 (13.5)	51.6 (14.3)	0.95	4.1%
Leg TTP_Perf (s)	23 (8)	21 (7)	0.76	11.0%
Washout time (s)	11 (4)	11 (5)	0.90	8.8%
Upslope (%HbO₂/s)	0.9 (0.4)	0.9 (0.5)	0.79	18.5%
T_2^*max (%)	111 (4)	112 (4)	0.78	1.1%
TTP_T2* (s)	35 (12)	35 (11)	0.61	15.3%

Healthy subjects – Inter-session
	Session 1	Session 2	ICC	CV_W

Leg Peak Perfusion (mL/min/100g)	52.1 (14.2)	50.3 (17.1)	0.78	11.8%
Leg TTP_Perf (s)	23 (8)	21 (7)	0.71	10.9%
Washout time (s)	12 (4)	14 (9)	0.61	23.4%
Upslope (%HbO₂/s)	0.9 (0.5)	0.8 (0.4)	0.57	24.4%
T_2^*max (%)	111 (4)	110 (3)	0.58	2.0%
TTP_T2* (s)	37 (12)	36 (12)	0.58	16.5%

Patients with PAD – Inter-session
	Session 1	Session 2	ICC	CV_W

ABI	0.59 (1.5)	0.59 (1.7)	0.53	11.8%
Leg Peak Perfusion (mL/min/100g)	23.3 (8.9)	35.5 (9.5)	0.52	20.3%
Leg TTP_Perf (s)	68 (42)	72 (44)	0.78	22.0%
Washout time (s)	34 (17)	30 (16)	0.13	31.9%
Upslope (%HbO₂/s)	0.5 (0.2)	0.7 (0.4)	0.08	36.7%
T_2^*max (%)	106 (3)	106 (3)	0.33	1.9%
TTP_T2* (s)	90 (49)	84 (39)	0.57	23.4%