Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 4;106(2):186–193. doi: 10.1111/cas.12588

Table 3.

Diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT parameters to discriminate between complete response and non-complete response groups of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 55) after two cycles and the last cycle of treatment with bendamustine–rituximab

Threshold, % AUC P-value Sensitivity, % Specificity, %
Baseline – two cycles
 ΔSUV02 66.0 0.770 0.0230 80.0 60.0
 ΔSUL02 65.0 0.700 0.0300 80.0 60.0
 ΔMTV02 68.0 0.776 0.0400 73.3 62.0
 ΔΣMTV02 66.0 0.867 0.0490 73.3 60.0
 ΔTLG02 68.0 0.784 0.0300 74.6 63.8
 ΔΣTLG02 67.0 0.875 0.0470 80.0 65.0
 ΔAUC-CSH02 −3.7 0.419 0.3590 53.3 55.0
Baseline – last cycle
 ΔSUV0L 75.0 0.728 0.0010 73.8 67.8
 ΔSUL0L 70.0 0.697 0.0140 72.7 66.7
 ΔMTV0L 65.0 0.758 0.0010 80.1 69.7
 ΔΣMTV0L 61.0 0.865 0.0010 77.3 75.8
 ΔTLG0L 67.0 0.765 0.0010 77.3 75.8
 ΔΣTLG0L 66.0 0.878 <0.0001 81.8 75.8
 ΔAUC-CSH0L −6.0 0.591 0.2570 63.6 54.5

AUC, area under the curve; Δ, percentage change; 02, from baseline to after 2 cycle; 0L, from baseline to after last cycle; SUV, maximum standardized uptake value; SUL, standardized uptake value corrected by lean body mass; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; ΣMTV, sum of MTV for a maximum of 6 target lesions per patient; TLG, total lesion glycolysis; ΣTLG, sum of TLG for a maximum of 6 target lesions per patient; AUC-CSH, area under the curve of cumulative SUV-volume histogram.