Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 3;15:25. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0020-y

Table 1.

Proportion of patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for inappropriate indications by year, stratified by urologist characteristics

Urologist characteristics Categories Urologist sample ADT use for inappropriate indications by year
N % 2000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007
Total 2214 100 44.2 44.3 46.6 44.7 36.2 33.4 31.1
Age (years): <45 694 31.3 40.9 45.4 48.2 40.4 33.5 30.2 29.6
45 - 54 630 28.5 44.2 44.1 44.4 46.0 37.8 32.4 30.2
55 - 64 672 30.4 45.2 42.4 46.1 45.7 35.4 35.0 32.5
≥65 218 9.8 48.7 49.2 55.1 45.6 38.9 41.7 35.5
Sex: Female 55 2.5 38.5 44.4 26.9 31.8 33.3 34.4 34.5
Male 2159 97.5 44.3 44.3 46.7 44.8 36.2 33.4 31.1
Years in practice: <15 864 40.1 39.7 43.2 46.1 41.7 33.5 30.8 28.4
15 - 24 548 25.4 43.5 42.6 44.0 46.3 39.9 32.9 33.2
25 - 34 488 22.6 47.6 44.5 47.9 44.4 33.5 35.4 31.3
≥35 255 11.8 48.1 47.1 53.0 46.4 40.7 40.7 34.0
Board certification: Yes 1725 77.9 44.6 44.1 46.0 44.2 36.1 33.5 30.9
No 489 22.1 42.7 44.9 48.8 46.4 36.8 33.0 31.9
Academic affiliation: Major or Minor 1338 66.2 41.5 43.2 44.7 41.9 33.3 31.9 28.9
None 684 33.8 47.6 46.0 49.0 48.2 40.1 35.5 33.6
Patient panel size (no. of patients): <14 685 30.9 37.7 44.7 42.1 46.1 34.7 35.6 29.2
14 - 44 603 27.2 39.8 40.6 47.3 43.1 36.7 32.0 30.1
45 - 74 452 20.4 47.2 48.2 47.2 44.9 37.8 33.4 36.0
≥75 474 21.4 47.6 43.7 49.3 44.6 35.6 32.9 29.0