Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 16.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2009 Jul 2;49(0):108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.022

Table 2.

Anthropometric results at baseline and after 1 year among 123 employees (St. Louis, MO, USA, 2005–2006).

Outcome Worksite Aa
(Assessment + Intervention)
Worksite Ba
(Assessment Only)
P value between
sitesb
95% confidence interval
for changes from baseline
to 1 year between sitesc


Baseline 1 year Baseline 1 year
N 68 68 55 55
Weight (kg) 92.4 (24.9) 91.6 (25.5) 84.5 (20.9) 85.1 (23.2) 0.02 (−3.90, −0.31)
Body mass index (kg/m2) 34.5 (9.7) 34.1 (9.8) 31.1 (7.2) 31.2 (7.9) 0.02 (−1.44, −0.11)
% Fat mass
  All subjects 44.8 (11.9) 44.2 (12.0) 39.2 (11.9) 38.7 (12.7) 0.52 (−1.44, 0.74)
  Females 46.4 (10.5) 45.9 (10.8) 43.1 (9.1) 42.4 (10.8)
  Males 23.5 (4.3) 23.4 (2.9) 21.9 (5.7) 22.4 (6.1)
Fat mass (kg)
  All subjects 43.6 (21.7) 42.9 (22.0) 33.9 (16.6) 34.2 (18.3) 0.04 (−3.08, −0.05)
  Females 45.2 (21.6) 44.5 (22.0) 37.0 (16.7) 37.1 (18.8)
  Males 22.6 (7.8) 22.1 (7.1) 20.7 (7.7) 21.7 (8.5)
Fat-free mass (kg)
  All subjects 48.8 (8.6) 48.8 (8.6) 49.7 (11.5) 50.0 (12.1) 0.04 (−1.05, −0.12)
  Females 47.0 (5.4) 47.0 (5.4) 45.1 (4.9) 45.2 (5.3)
  Males 71.3 (9.2) 70.7 (11.2) 70.1 (9.8) 71.0 (11.0)
a

Values represent mean (SD).

b

Site-by-time interaction.

c

Smoking status and use of weight-affecting drugs over time were controlled for in the analysis.