Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 15;15:34. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0190-5

Table 3.

Adjusted 1 prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% CI for impairments in EQ-5D, by HL 2 and CD 2

HL level The presence/absence of CD P 3
High HL Low HL With CD Without CD
With CD (ref. without CD) With CD (ref. without CD) Low HL (ref. high HL) Low HL (ref. high HL)
EQ-5D Impairments PRs (95% CI) PRs (95%CI) PRs (95% CI) PRs (95% CI)
Mobility 3.86 (1.67, 8.95) 3.56 (2.00, 6.35) 1.10 (0.58, 2.11) 3.95 (1.47, 10.65) 0.978
Self-care 4.62 (1.90, 11.22) 3.87 (1.69, 8.87) 0.79 (0.36, 1.73) 0.94 (0.25, 3.53) 0.797
Usual activities 2.71 (1.81, 4.05) 2.46 (1.54, 3.92) 0.80 (0.49, 1.31) 1.34 (0.70, 2.56) 0.928
Pain/discomfort 3.19 (2.52, 4.05) 2.15 (1.76, 2.64) 1.04 (0.87, 1.25) 1.63 (1.13, 2.34) 0.033
Anxiety/depression 2.28 (1.73, 3.01) 1.99 (1.52, 2.61) 1.00 (0.75, 1.34) 1.11 (0.73, 1.68) 0.791

1: Log-binomial regression models, adjusting for age, ethnicity, income, education, geographical location. Significant PRs and 95% CI were shown in bold at P <0.05.

2: HL = health literacy CD = chronic disease.

3: P for interaction by wald χ 2 tests between CD and HL in the log-binomial regression models for the entire sample. Significant P values were shown in bold at the level of less than 0.05.