Table 2.
Test | Time (min) |
Advantages | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
Mini-Mental Status Examination118 (MMSE) | 7–10 | Most widely used and studied worldwide Often used as a reference for comparative evaluations of other assessments Required for some drug insurance reimbursements |
Education/age/language/culture bias Ceiling effect (highly educated impaired subjects pass) Proprietary: unless used from memory, test needs to be purchased Best performance for at least moderate cognitive impairment |
Montreal Cognitive Assessment119 (MoCA) | 10–15 | Designed to test for mild cognitive impairment Multiple languages accessible Tests many separate domains (7) |
Lacks studies in general practice settings Education bias (≤12 y) Limited use and evidence: published data are relatively new (2005) Administration time ≥10 min |
St Louis University Mental Status Examination120 (SLUMS) | 7 | No education bias Tests many separate domains (7) |
Limited use and evidence: published data are relatively new (2006) Studied in Veterans Affairs geriatric clinic (predominantly white males) |
Mini-Cog121 | 2–4 | Developed for and validated in primary care and multiple languages/cultures Little or no education/language/race bias Short administration time |
Use of different word lists may affect failure rates Some study results based on longer tests with the Mini-Cog elements reviewed independently |
Adapted from Cordell CB, Borson S, Boustani M, et al. Alzheimer’s Association recommendations for operationalizing the detection of cognitive impairment during the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit in a primary care setting. Alzheimers Dement 2013;9(2):147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.09.011; with permission.