Table 1.
Rating | Definition |
---|---|
1.0 | dermis and hypodermis not evaluable due to poor image |
2.0 | at least 1 layer evaluable but other is not or at least 50% of both layers are evaluable* |
3.0 | at least 50% of both layers are evaluable; no well-defined epidermal entry echo, no defined layer margin between all 3 layers |
3.1 | approximated epidermal entry echo, no clearly defined layer margin between dermis and hypodermis |
3.2 | defined epidermal entry echo, no clearly defined layer margin between dermis and hypodermis |
3.3 | well-defined epidermal entry echo, no clearly defined layer margin between dermis and hypodermis |
3.4 | approximated epidermal entry echo, layer margin between dermis and hypodermis can be approximated |
3.5 | defined epidermal entry echo, layer margin between dermis and hypodermis can be approximated |
3.6 | defined epidermal entry echo, layer margin between dermis and hypodermis can be determined |
3.7 | defined epidermal entry echo, well-defined layer margin between dermis and hypodermis |
3.8 | well-defined epidermal entry echo, well-defined layer margin between dermis and hypodermis |
3.9 | very high quality image, some minor image defects on lateral areas |
4.0 | all of both layers are evaluable, no interfering image artifacts present, no visible image defects - essentially flawless image |
at least 50% of the image widths of both layers are evaluable with the evaluable portions positioned over each other