Table 2.
Firing rate map correlations between each of the 4 compartments and each of the others, both for the ordered data and for the shuffled data
| Ordered data |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compartment | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 1 | – | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.37 |
| 2 | – | 0.60 | 0.46 | |
| 3 | – | 0.53 | ||
| 4 | – | |||
| Shuffled data | ||||
| Compartment |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| 1 | – | −0.04 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| 2 | – | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| 3 | – | 0.00 | ||
| 4 | – | |||
Note: The correlations for the shuffled data were low, as would be expected, whereas for the ordered data they were high, indicating a high degree of self-similarity in the firing fields.