. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 17.

Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Dec 17;40(2):301–309. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9699-8

Table 2.

Mean scores of non-standardized CATS subscales for the three-part cluster solution

CAT scale	Low Abuse (n = 175)		Intermediate Abuse (n = 94)		High Abuse (n = 23)		Test statistic F(2, 289)

	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD
Sexual abuse^a	1.04^a	0.13	1.24^b	0.30	2.69 c	0.65	210.83^*
Punishment^b	2.30^a	0.53	2.90^b	0.77	3.46 c	1.00	26.19^*
Neglect^b	1.72^a	0.40	2.81^b	0.54	3.55 c	0.85	145.33^*

Note For MANOVA of non-standardized CATS scores by cluster membership, Pillai’s trace=1.12, F(6, 576)=122.99, p < .001. Cluster means for CATS scores with different letters were significantly different by Tukey HSD tests with significance levels of .001

p < .001

Absolute range, 1–4.5

Absolute range, 1–5