Table 2.
Quality indicators from Newcastle-Ottawa scale
Study | Selection | Comparability | Exposure/Outcome | Score | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5a | 5b | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
Hemminki 2010 | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | yes | 9 |
Stattin 2007 | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | 8 |
Atchison 2011 | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | 9 |
Wotton 2011(a) | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | 7 |
Wotton 2011(b) | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | 8 |
Yood 2009 | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes | 7 |
Wideroff 1997 | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | 5 |
Adami 1991 | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | 6 |
Ragozzino 1980 | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | 6 |
Footnote: 1, indicates exposed cohort truly representative; 2, the non exposed cohort drawn from the same community; 3, ascertainment of exposure by secure record or structured interview; 4, outcome of interest was not present at start of study; 5A, cohorts comparable on basis of sex and age; 5B, cohorts comparable on other factor(s); 6, quality of outcome assessment; 7, follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur; and 8, complete follow up