Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;43(7):857–866.

Table 2.

Quality indicators from Newcastle-Ottawa scale

Study Selection Comparability Exposure/Outcome Score
1 2 3 4 5a 5b 6 7 8
Hemminki 2010 yes yes yes yes yes Yes Yes Yes yes 9
Stattin 2007 yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes 8
Atchison 2011 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9
Wotton 2011(a) yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes no 7
Wotton 2011(b) yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes 8
Yood 2009 yes yes yes yes yes no yes no yes 7
Wideroff 1997 yes no yes yes no no yes yes no 5
Adami 1991 yes no yes yes no no yes yes yes 6
Ragozzino 1980 yes no yes yes no no yes yes yes 6

Footnote: 1, indicates exposed cohort truly representative; 2, the non exposed cohort drawn from the same community; 3, ascertainment of exposure by secure record or structured interview; 4, outcome of interest was not present at start of study; 5A, cohorts comparable on basis of sex and age; 5B, cohorts comparable on other factor(s); 6, quality of outcome assessment; 7, follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur; and 8, complete follow up