Skip to main content
. 2015 May 1;111:251–266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.033

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

a: Experiment S2: Activity profiles of right phF5c (109 voxels from Experiment 3) in 7 subjects common to Experiments 3 (only runs with right fixation) and S2. Same color code as in Fig. 5. The interaction proved significant for fixation down (Experiment 3, F1,6 = 25, p < 0.005, left), but not for fixation up (Experiment S2, F1,6 = 0.2, p > 0.6, right). b: Experiment S3. Activity profiles of 8 most significant voxels after SVC in the a priori ROI derived from Experiment 3, for the fixation runs (left, ‘yes’, orange hatching) and no-fixation runs (middle & right, ‘no’, yellow hatching). For the fixation runs the LM (50, − 4, 50, t = 2.25, p < 0.03) was located within 5 mm of the LM in Experiment 4, for non-fixation runs the LM (46, 10, 46, t = 2.09, p < 0.04) was located at more than 10 mm from the LM in Experiment 4. The visual response to the person acting was significant in the fixation runs (‘yes’, paired t test with fixation t8 = 2.5, p < 0.04), but not the non-fixation runs (‘no’, t8 = 0.27, p > 07 for 50, − 4, 50, and t8 = 0.15 p > 0.7 for 46, 10, 46). Vertical bars indicate SE across subjects.