Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2014 Dec 5;64(3):469–489. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12087

Table 2.

Model selection using the CL-AIC and CL-BIC when analyzing the data in Xing et al. (2011).

Model ds∗ −2logCL CL-AIC CL-BIC
baseline 18 1537 1573 1620
+ I(Regional)*I(US) 21 1534 1576 1632
+ I(Regional)*I(CT) 21 1535 1577 1632
+ I(Regional)*I(PET) 21 1534 1576 1632
+ I(Regional)*I(US) + I(Regional)*I(CT) 24 1532 1580 1643
+ I(Regional)*I(US) + I(Regional)*I(PET) 24 1529 1577 1641
+ I(Regional)*I(CT) + I(Regional)*I(PET) 24 1533 1581 1644
+ I(Regional)*I(US) + I(Regional)*I(CT) + I(Regional)*I(PET) 27 1525 1579 1650

baseline: meta-analysis model with study-level covariates of I(Regional) + I(US) + I(CT) + I(PET).