Table 2. AIRE item scores.
AIRE Scoring items | 1. Purpose | 2. Selection criteria | 3. Organizational context | 4. Quality domain | 5. Healthcare process | 6. Relevant professional groups included | 7. Involvement | 8. Formally endorsed. | 9. Systematic search methods | 10. Guideline recommendations or peer reviewed studies | 11. Critical appraisal of supporting evidence | 12. Description of numerator and denominator | 13. Defined target patient population | 14. Strategy for risk adjustment | 15. Validity | 16. Reliability | 17. Discriminative power. | 18. Practice pilot | 19. Data collection efforts | 20. Presenting and interpreting instructions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRE categories | 1. Purpose, relevance and organizational context | 2. Stakeholder involvement | 3. Scientific evidence | 4. Additional evidence, formulation and usage | ||||||||||||||||
QRC Advisor, 1995 | 19 | 16 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 15 | 8 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 13 | 8 |
McLoughling 2006 | 28 | 27 | 24 | 27 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 23 | 14 | 9 | 17 | 22 | 12 |
NSW TAG 2007 | 28 | 25 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 23 | 26 | 16 | 24 | 17 | 28 | 27 | 17 | 27 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 27 | 27 |
Nigam et al, 2008 | 24 | 21 | 22 | 28 | 27 | 28 | 26 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 11 | 26 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 12 |
Cheng et al, 2010 | 28 | 26 | 25 | 28 | 28 | 20 | 16 | 12 | 27 | 20 | 17 | 19 | 22 | 10 | 21 | 15 | 9 | 15 | 22 | 16 |
High AIRE scores are in bold (21–28)