Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 5;372(10):933–943. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404599

Table 3.

Treatment Effects on Neurologic Outcomes According to Study Group.*

Bayley-III Component 12-Mo Follow-up 24-Mo Follow-up
6-Mo Group 6-Wk Group P Value 6-Mo Group 6-Wk Group P Value
Cognitive composite 0.01 0.02

 No. of participants 43 45 42 41

 Mean 89.6±3.0 79.5±2.8 84.4±2.6 76.0±2.6

 Range 55–115 9.5–120 55–135 55–110

Language composite 0.009 0.004

 No. of participants 41 43 41 41

 Mean 87.6±3.0 76.8±2.9 84.6±2.9 72.5±2.9

 Range 47–118 11–112 47–121 47–103

Receptive-communication scale 0.05 0.003

 No. of participants 41 43 41 41

 Mean 7.5±0.5 6.1±0.5 7.3±0.5 5.2±0.5

 Range 1–14 1–12 1–14 1–10

Expressive-communication scale 0.02 0.02

 No. of participants 41 44 41 41

 Mean 8.0±0.5 6.5±0.5 7.3±0.5 5.5±0.5

 Range 1–13 1–13 1–13 1–11

Motor composite 0.03 0.01

 No. of participants 42 44 41 40

 Mean 82.6±3.2 73.2±3.0 85.5±3.3 74.1±3.2

 Range 46–112 11–112 46–121 46–121

Fine-motor scale 0.11 0.06

 No. of participants 41 44 42 40

 Mean 7.3±0.6 6.0±0.6 8.0±0.6 6.4±0.6

 Range 1–11 0.1–13 1–15 1–19

Gross-motor scale 0.07 0.02

 No. of participants 42 44 42 40

 Mean 6.7±0.5 5.4±0.5 7.0±0.5 5.3±0.5

 Range 1–14 0.1–15 1–13 1–12
*

Plus–minus values are means ±SE. Data were adjusted for central nervous system involvement at baseline, prematurity, and age at the initiation of treatment. A P value of less than 0.0071 (i.e., 0.05 divided by 7) was considered to indicate statistical significance, with the use of Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing. Ranges represent the minimum and maximum values of the raw data.

All the composite scores on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition (Bayley-III), range from 40 to 160, with higher scores indicating better developmental outcomes. All the scale scores on the Bayley-III range from 1 to 19, with higher scores indicating better developmental outcomes. Decimal points in the ranges reflect the specific raw data in the scales for at least one study participant, as captured on the case-report form and verified during the on-site monitoring visits.