Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Oct 18;19(1):35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.10.002

Table 2.

Overall measurement agreement between Actigraph regression models and Oxycon Mobile in energy expenditure measurement.

Method 90% CI of Regression Models Equivalence zone of OM Correlations MAPE (%)

Type M SE Lower bound Upper bound Lower bound Upper bound r P-value M SD
Criterion measure
OMa 4.03 0.06 - - 3.63 4.43 - - - -
Regression Models
 VM2RMb 2.88 0.05 2.79 2.97 - - 0.53 <0.0001 28.2 9.3
 VA2RMc 2.64 0.04 2.57 2.71 - - 0.58 <0.0001 34.2 7.2
 FT1RMd 2.76 0.06 2.65 2.86 - - 0.37 0.0040 31.5 11.0
 TR1RMe 2.46 0.10 2.29 2.62 - - 0.30 0.0221 40.2 15.5
 PU1RMf 1.54 0.04 1.47 1.60 - - 0.37 0.0036 61.7 7.2
 TH1RMg 2.55 0.06 2.44 2.65 - - 0.35 0.0068 36.6 11.3

Note: Values are METRMR (metabolic equivalents taking into account resting metabolic rate) unless otherwise noted.

a

Oxycon Mobile;

b

Vector magnitude 2 regression model;

c

Vertical axis 2 regression model;

d

Freedson/Trost 1 regression model;

e

Trost 1 regression model;

f

Puyau 1 regression model;

g

Treuth 1 regression model

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure