Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014 Dec 2;43(3):200–207. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12140

Table 4.

Estimated relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from multivariate negative binomial regression models for new d12mfs and new d2mfs in primary dentition among low-income African American children, Detroit, Michigan, 2002–2007

New d12mfsa
New d2mfsa
RR 95% CI RR 95% CI


Baseline NCCL 1.10 0.92 1.31 1.44 1.28 1.62
Baseline CCL 1.15 1.02 1.30 1.12 1.01 1.24
Child’s age 0.57 0.43 0.75 0.68 0.57 0.82
Child’s sex (female vs. male) 1.18 0.59 2.38 1.32 0.80 2.18
Caregiver’s age 1.04 0.99 1.10 1.01 0.97 1.05
Caregiver’s education (high school degree vs. < high school) 1.13 0.44 2.89 1.14 0.61 2.15
Caregiver’s education (> high school vs. < high school) 1.11 0.29 4.28 1.08 0.45 2.57
Annual household income ($10K+ vs. <$10K) 1.03 0.38 2.75 0.94 0.49 1.82
Caregiver’s full-time employment (yes vs. no) 0.73 0.33 1.62 0.68 0.41 1.14
Household size (3–4 vs. 2) 0.85 0.30 2.46 0.76 0.33 1.74
Household size (5 or more vs. 2) 1.13 0.37 3.47 1.00 0.40 2.55
Dental insurance (yes vs. no) 1.27 0.53 3.07 0.91 0.50 1.68
Child’s soda consumption (yes vs. no) 2.42 1.15 5.08 1.61 0.85 3.06
Oral health fatalistic belief (yes vs. no) 2.12 0.90 5.03 1.56 0.91 2.67
Caregiver’s smoking status (yes vs. no) 1.04 0.49 2.21 1.06 0.62 1.79
Crack in wall (Yes vs. no) 2.03 0.93 4.46 1.63 0.89 2.99
Social support in 5 areas (Yes vs. no) 0.74 0.30 1.78 0.90 0.52 1.56

Notes: Numbers in bold indicate statistical significance at p<0.05 level.

a

New d12mfs = number of new non-cavitated lesions + number of new cavitated lesions + number of new fillings + number of new missing teeth due to caries; New d2mfs = number of new cavitated lesions + number of new fillings + number of new missing teeth due to caries.