Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 15;8(2):2156–2164.

Table 3.

Meta-analysis results

Comparisons OR 95% CI P value Heterogeneity Effects model

I2 P value
B vs A
    rs9642880 1.20 1.13–1.27 < 0.00001 0% 0.53 F
        Caucasian 1.18 1.09-1.28 < 0.0001 0% 0.63 F
        Asian 1.22 1.11-1.35 < 0.0001 25% 0.26 F
    rs2294008 1.14 1.11-1.18 < 0.00001 14% 0.32 F
        Caucasian 1.13 1.09-1.17 < 0.00001 69% 0.07 F
        Asian 1.22 1.11-1.35 < 0.0001 0% 0.99 F
BB vs AA
    rs9642880 1.37 1.21–1.55 < 0.00001 0% 0.54 F
        Caucasian 1.39 1.19-1.62 < 0.0001 0% 0.71 F
        Asian 1.33 1.07-1.65 0.009 33% 0.21 F
    rs2294008 1.28 1.20-1.37 < 0.00001 0% 0.57 F
        Caucasian 1.28 1.19-1.37 < 0.00001 61% 0.11 F
        Asian 1.32 1.03-1.69 0.03 0% 0.86 F
AB vs AA
    rs9642880 1.20 1.09–1.32 0.0002 6% 0.39 F
        Caucasian 1.07 0.94-1.23 0.30 0% 0.97 F
        Asian 1.36 1.18-1.54 < 0.0001 0% 0.68 F
    rs2294008 1.23 1.17-1.30 < 0.00001 0% 0.65 F
        Caucasian 1.21 1.14-1.29 < 0.00001 0% 0.53 F
        Asian 1.32 1.16-1.51 < 0.0001 0% 0.74 F
AB + BB vs AA
    rs9642880 1.25 1.14–1.37 < 0.00001 0% 0.56 F
        Caucasian 1.17 1.03-1.33 0.01 0% 0.90 F
        Asian 1.35 1.18-1.54 < 0.00001 0% 0.41 F
    rs2294008 1.25 1.19-1.31 < 0.00001 0% 0.64 F
        Caucasian 1.23 1.17-1.30 < 0.00001 13% 0.28 F
        Asian 1.32 1.17-1.50 < 0.0001 0% 0.86 F
BB vs AA + AB
    rs9642880 1.26 1.13-1.40 < 0.0001 0% 0.54 F
        Caucasian 1.33 1.17-1.51 < 0.0001 0% 0.63 F
        Asian 1.09 0.89-1.34 0.40 0% 0.63 F
    rs2294008 1.13 1.07-1.20 < 0.0001 0% 0.56 F
        Caucasian 1.13 1.06-1.20 < 0.0001 57% 0.13 F
        Asian 1.17 0.92-1.48 0.20 0% 0.76 F

A represents the major allele, B represents the minor allele, F: fixed effects model, R: random effects model.