Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Dev Psychol. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):433–443. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.08.001

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Hypothesized correlated factor measurement model with three latent factors; χ2(20) = 63.955, p < .001; CFI = .98; RMSEA = .05; SRMR = .02. All coefficients are standardized estimates and significant at p < .05 (two-tailed). To reduce the complexity of the figure, most correlated residuals between SC and BSR for specifying the same source were omitted in the figure. Variable naming convention: Alphabet (_T and _P) at the end of variables indicates source of measured variables; _T = teacher-rated and _P = peer-rated. EC = effortful control; SC = social competence; BSR = behavioral self-regulation; EC_IC = inhibitory control; EC_TA = task accuracy; SC_PEERLIK_T = teacher-rated peer-rated likability; SC_PROSOC_T = teacher-rated prosocial behavior; SC_LIKE_P = peer-rated likability; SC_PROSOC_P = peer-rated prosocial behavior; BSR_CENG_T = teacher-rated classroom engagement; BSR_ACBC_T = teacher-rated attention control & behavioral control; BSR_BCON_P = peer-rated behavioral control; BSR_BCOM_P = peer-rated behavioral compliance.