Table 5.
Moderator analyses on behavior (first post-test)
Moderator | n | k | Hedges’ g (95% CI) | p | Q | p | I2 Index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHPP study quality | 312914 | 20 | 0.00 | 0.974 | |||
Weak | 1876 | 1 | 0.123 [0.032; 0.213] | <.01 | NA | ||
Moderate | 1245 | 5 | 0.267 [0.129; 0.404] | <.001 | 1.50 | 0.827 | 0% |
Strong | 311670 | 15 | 0.263 [0.122; 0.404] | <.001 | 400.28 | <.001 | 97% |
| |||||||
Study design | 312914 | 20 | 5.92 | 0.052 | |||
Non-equivalent post-test only | 1876 | 1 | 0.123 [0.032; 0.213] | <.01 | NA | ||
Non-equivalent pretest- post-test control group | 13383 | 9 | 0.269 [−0.032; 0.570] | .080 | 358.17 | <.001 | 98% |
Post-test only control group | 298100 | 3 | 0.099 [0.087; 0.111] | <.001 | 0.53 | 0.767 | 0.000 |
Pre-test post-test control group | 1432 | 8 | 0.325 [0.121; 0.529] | <.01 | 23.79 | <.01 | 71% |
| |||||||
Tailoring | 7195 | 16 | 0.357 | 0.550 | |||
No tailoring | 3925 | 10 | 0.234 [0.101; 0.368] | <.01 | 27.79 | <.01 | 68% |
Tailoring by socio-demo | 675 | 1 | 0.194 [−0.041; 0.429] | 0.105 | NA | ||
Tailoring by stages/needs | 3270 | 6 | 0.414 [−0.160; 0.989] | 0.158 | 245.82 | <.001 | 98% |
Tailoring by socio-demo & stages/needs | 907 | 1 | −0.096 [−0.229; 0.038] | 0.162 | NA | ||
| |||||||
Theoretical foundation | 314050 | 19 | 3.16 | 0.206 | |||
None mentioned | 2243 | 3 | 0.131 [0.047; 0.215] | <.01 | 0.23 | 0.890 | 0% |
Only behavioral prediction theory | 308852 | 7 | 0.270 [0.061; 0.480] | <.05 | 370.17 | <.001 | 98% |
Only game theory | 66 | 1 | 0.496 [0.012; 0.981] | <.05 | NA | ||
Game and clinical psychology approaches/theory-based methods | 675 | 1 | 0.194 [−0.041; 0.429] | 0.105 | NA | ||
Both behavioral and game theory | 2955 | 9 | 0.275 [0.104; 0.446] | <.01 | 29.96 | <.001 | 73% |
| |||||||
Implementation method | 314790 | 21 | 1.22 | 0.269 | |||
Stand-alone | 5517 | 12 | 0.307 [−0.004; 0.618] | 0.053 | 271.61 | <.001 | 96% |
Multi-component | 309273 | 9 | 0.127 [0.052; 0.202] | <.01 | 41.17 | <.001 | 81% |
Categories with fewer than 3 observations were removed from moderator analyses when calculating heterogeneity