Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov 14;13(5):895–905.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.10.036

Table 2.

Eradication rates by ITT analysis and PP analysis in the first-line and rescue regimens

First-line regimens HDDT group ST group CLA-TT group P-value
ITT analysis
 Eradication rate 95.3 (143/150) 85.3 (128/150) 80.7 (121/150) <0.001
 95% C.I. 91.9–98.8 79.6–91.1 74.3–87.1
 P-value*
  HDDT group - 0.025 <0.001
  ST group 0.025 - 0.440
  CLA-TT group <0.001 0.440 -
PP analysis
 Eradication rate 96.6 (143/148) 86.5 (128/148) 81.2 (121/149) <0.001
 95% C.I. 93.7–99.6 80.9–92.1 74.9–87.6
 P-value*
  HDDT group - 0.018 <0.001
  ST group 0.018 - 0.328
  CLA-TT group <0.001 0.328 -
Rescue regimens HDDT group ST group LEV-TT group P-value
ITT analysis
 Eradication rate 89.3 (50/56) 51.8 (29/56) 78.6 (44/56) <0.001
 95% C.I. 80.9–97.6 38.3–65.3 67.5–89.7
 P-value*
  HDDT group - <0.001 0.363
  ST group <0.001 - 0.002
  LEV-TT group 0.366 0.002 -
PP analysis
 Eradication rate 89.3 (50/56) 53.7 (29/54) 78.6 (44/56) <0.001
 95% C.I. 80.9–97.6 40.0–67.4 67.8–89.7
 P-value*
  HDDT group - <0.001 0.363
  ST group <0.001 - 0.006
  LEV-TT group 0.363 0.006 -

Data are % (n/N); HDDT: high-dose dual therapy; ST: sequential therapy; CLA-TT: clarithromycin-containing triple therapy; LEV-TT: levofloxacin-containing triple therapy; ITT: intention-to-treat; PP: per-protocol; C.I.: confidence interval.

*

P values from pairwise comparison made by Tukey’s all-pairwise test.