Table 2.
Within-task (A) ANOVA and (B) paired comparison results. Significant main effects and interactions are present for all three tasks. Similarly, significant incongruency effects were present for all SOAs in all tasks.
| Stroop-50/50 | Reverse Stroop-50/50 | Reverse Stroop-80/20 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A) | ANOVA | F(df) | sig. | F(df) | sig. | F(df) | sig. | |||
| cong | F(1,27) = 191.4 | p<.001 | F(1,27) = 180.3 | p<.001 | F(1,17) = 53.4 | p<.001 | ||||
| SOA | F(2.5,66.8) = 80.9 | p<.001 | F(2.8,77.1) = 143.8 | p<.001 | F(2.8,47.5) = 151.4 | p<.001 | ||||
| COng × SOA | F(3.1,84.9) = 24.5 | p<.001 | F(3.7,99) = 28.8 | p<.001 | F(3.2,54.8) = 22.3 | p<.001 | ||||
| B) | T-Tests | Δ RT | t-value | sig. | Δ RT | t-value | sig. | Δ RT | t-value | sig. |
| −200 ms | 120.8 | t(27) = 13.8 | p<.001 | 60.7 | t(27) = 10.8 | p<.001 | 125.6 | t(17) = 11.3 | p<.001 | |
| −100 ms | 71.7 | t(27) = 11.0 | p<.001 | 46.8 | t(27) = 14.5 | p<.001 | 75.3 | t(17) = 8.0 | p<.001 | |
| 0 ms | 65.5 | t(27) = 8.6 | p<.001 | 42.9 | t(27) = 10.4 | p<.001 | 70.7 | t(17) = 6.3 | p<.001 | |
| 100 ms | 61.6 | t(27) = 9.1 | p<.001 | 27.6 | t(27) = 7.1 | p<.001 | 62.3 | t(17) = 4.5 | p<.001 | |
| 200 ms | 32.9 | t(27) = 3.9 | p=.001 | 10.6 | t(27) = 2.5 | p=.015 | 43 | t(17) = 3.3 | p= .004 | |
(Note: 2-tailed t-test significances are reported)