Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Dec 17;26(5):1021–1038. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00542

Table 4.

Summary of significant NINC and LPC latencies for the three experimental variants. Latency ranges of significant (p<.05) run-length-corrected permutation comparisons between incongruent and congruent waveforms for each SOA are indicated for the 3 tasks.

• Latency Ranges of Significant NINC Component Activity
Stroop-50/50 ReverseStroop-50/50 ReverseStroop-80/20
−200 194 – 402 254 – 402 238 – 396
−100 262 – 476 250 – 396 292 – 396
0 334 – 572 306 – 496 292 – 436
+100 428 – 602 300 – 488 382 – 466
+200 484 – 688 444 – 568 436 – 582
• Latency Ranges of Significant LPC Component Activity
Stroop-50/50 ReverseStroop-50/50 ReverseStroop-80/20
−200 494 – 936 450 – 856 428 – 886
−100 516 – 920 496 – 864 428 – 1026
0 654 – 988 586 – 846 626 – 982
+100 646 – 1080 586 – 768 638 – 1042
+200 777 – 1077# 662 – 962# 760 – 1060#

The “#” indicates that these latencies are estimated from local peak latency, because their activity levels did not reach significance in the permutation tests.