Table 1.
Isoform | Rectification | Ba2+ IC50 (nM) | Voltage (mV) | [K+]o (mM) | K+-activated?* | NVU expression* | Refs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIR1.1 | Weak | 4300 | 0 | 100 | Yes | Neurons | Astrocytes | Parenchymal arteriole | [3,12,23,48,70,110] |
✓ | n.d. | n.d | |||||||
KIR2.1 | Strong | 3.2 | −100 | 60 | Yes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [17,26,39,47,65,67,107,108] |
KIR2.2 | Strong | 0.5 | −100 | 60 | Yes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [17,26,39,47,65,67,107,108] |
KIR2.3 | Strong | 10.3 | −100 | 60 | Yes | ✓ | ✓ | n.d. | [17,39,47,65,107,108] |
KIR2.4 | Strong | 390 | −80 | 96 | n.d | ✓ - cranial nerve nuclei | x | n.d. | [17,65,123] |
KIR3.1 | Strong | 14 (+3.4) a | −130 | 90 | No | ✓ | ✓ | n.d. | [9,47,59,80] |
KIR3.2 | Strong | n.d. b | No | ✓ | x | n.d. | [9,47,80] | ||
KIR3.3 | Strong | n.d. | No | ✓ | x | n.d. | [9,47,80] | ||
K|r3.4 | Strong | 92 | −60 | 100 | No | ✓ | x | n.d. | [9,45,47,80] |
K|r4.1 | Intermediate | 7.1 | −130 | 50 | No | x | ✓ | n.d. | [9,22,38,108] |
KIR4.2 | Intermediate | n.d. b | Yes | x | x | n.d. | [38,94] | ||
KIR5.1 | Strong | n.d. b | n.d | ✓ - cell culture | ✓ | n.d. | [38,108,121] | ||
KIR6.1 | Weak | 89.3 | +60 | 5.4 | No | x | ✓ | x | [16,41,122] |
KIR6.2 | Weak | 29.3 (+SUR1) | −102 | 5.6 | No | ✓ | x | x | [16,32,81,117,118,122] |
K|r7.1 | Weak | 1100-1900 | −110 | 150 | No | ✓ | ✓ | n.d | [19,55,92] |
K+-activation is defined as an increase in channel conductance in the presence of elevated [K+]o at a constant electrical driving force.
All brain regions considered, where it is known that expression is highly restricted this is noted. No distinction is made between the smooth muscle and endothelial expression of KIR subunits in parenchymal arterioles due to the current lack of evidence.
✓ = expression confirmed, x = lack of expression observed. n.d. = not investigated to date, to the authors’ knowledge.
KIR3.1 homomers are non-functional, association with other KIR3.x subunits is required for functional channels [39].