Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 10;15:28. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0025-6

Table 2.

Estimated effect of treatment option on HRQOL in a multiple regression analysis

Main analysis Analysis with separation of different RT treatment groups 1
Radical prostatectomy Radiotherapy Wald test Radiotherapy Wald test
Ref. Nerve-sparing Total Brachytherapy Combined (External/brachytherapy) External
b b 95%-CI b 95%-CI p-value b 95%-CI b 95%-CI b 95%-CI p-value
QLQ-C30
 Functioning scales
 Global health status 0 2.9 (−0.6, 6.4) −2.0 (−5.9, 2.0) 0.098 −1.0 (−6.2, 4.2) −2.2 (−8.4, 3.9) −4.4 (−9.9, 1.2) 0.120
 Physical functioning 0 1.7 (−0.6, 4.1) −0.9 (−4.3, 2.4) 0.198 −0.6 (−5.4, 4.3) −0.6 (−5.2, 3.9) −3.5 (−8.9, 2.0) 0.224
 Role functioning 0 1.9 (−1.5, 5.3) −0.5 (−4.8, 3.8) 0.425 −1.6 (−7.9, 4.7) 2.0 (−4.7, 8.7) −2.5 (−8.8, 3.8) 0.314
 Emotional functioning 0 3.8 (−0.2, 7.8) −2.7 (−7.3, 2.0) 0.074 −2.4 (−8.7, 3.9) 1.1 (−6.2, 8.3) −8.6 (−15.2, −2.0) 0.028
 Cognitive functioning 0 2.5 (−1.1, 6.2) −1.8 (−5.5, 1.9) 0.170 −0.7 (−6.0, 4.5) −2.2 (−8.2, 3.8) −2.7 (−9.5, 4.0) 0.277
 Social functioning 0 1.2 (−3.7, 6.1) 0.1 (−5.4, 5.5) 0.650 −0.7 (−7.9, 6.5) 3.0 (−5.1, 11.1) −5.7 (−14.3, 3.0) 0.287
Symptom scales
 Fatigue 0 −3.6 (−7.8, 0.5) 0.4 (−4.6, 5.3) 0.173 0.1 (−6.6, 6.8) −1.6 (−9.1, 5.9) 5.4 (−2.0, 12.9) 0.174
 Nausea and vomiting 0 −0.5 (−1.6, 0.6) 1.1 (−0.5, 2.7) 0.100 2.1 (0.1, 4.1) −0.5 (−2.2, 1.2) 0.6 (−1.8, 2.9) 0.091
 Pain 0 0.5 (−3.5, 4.5) 2.7 (−2.2, 7.5) 0.477 3.6 (−3.3, 10.5) 0.1 (−7.2, 7.3) 3.4 (−4.8, 11.6) 0.601
 Dyspnoea 0 1.4 (−2.1, 4.8) 3.5 (−0.8, 7.8) 0.177 0.1 (−5.6, 5.8) 6.8 (−0.5, 14.1) 4.8 (−1.5, 11.0 0.122
 Insomnia 0 0.1 (−4.7, 5.0) 3.2 (−2.5, 8.9) 0.451 4.3 (−2.9, 11.5) 4.0 (−4.7, 12.7) 6.4 (−2.8, 15.6) 0.291
 Appetite loss 0 −0.1 (−2.3, 2.1) 1.5 (−1.7, 4.7) 0.317 1.5 (−1.8, 4.8) 1.0 (−3.7, 5.6) 3.1 (−1.5, 7.6) 0.276
 Constipation 0 −1.2 (−5.3, 3.0) 0.4 (−4.1, 4.9) 0.542 1.7 (−4.2, 7.5) −0.9 (−8.4, 6.5) 3.2 (−5.5, 12.0) 0.362
 Diarrhoea 0 −0.9 (−4.4, 2.6) 7.0 (2.5, 11.6) 0.006 7.8 (1.0, 14.5) 4.1 (−3.3, 11.4) 4.2 (−3.6, 12.0) 0.048
 Financial difficulties 0 −3.1 (−7.0, 0.8) −0.2 (−4.7, 4.3) 0.257 −2.7 (−9.1, 3.7) −0.5 (−8.8, 7.7) 4.9 (−4.0, 13.8) 0.216
PORPUS
 PORPUS-P 0 2.3 (0.1, 4.6) 2.2 (−0.6, 5.0) 0.045 2.2 (−1.6, 6.1) 3.3 (−0.6, 7.2) 1.4 (−3.0, 5.7) 0.119

Ref = Non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy as reference level.

Bold values indicate significance at the 5%-level.

1As the regression coefficients of the radical prostatectomy group did not change much, only the regression coefficients of the radiotherapy subgroups with their confidence intervals and the Wald test p-values are reported.

Both analyses are adjusted for baseline HRQOL, age, having a partner (yes/no), highest education level (no graduation, 8–9 years (‘Hauptschulabschluss’), 10–11 years (‘Realschulabschluss’), >= 12 years high school (‘(Fach-)Abitur’)), working (yes/no), residence (rural/urban), tumour stage (T-category of the TNM-classification), pre-therapeutic Gleason score, pre-therapeutic PSA score, and sexual functioning at baseline (IIEF total scale).