Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Feb;30(2):232–239. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2344

Table 3.

Mean Annualized Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density by Anatomic Site in Primary and Sensitivity Analysis Models

Spine Femoral neck Total hip



Primary
modela
Sensitivity
analysis modelb
Primary
modela
Sensitivity
analysis modelc
Primary
modela
Sensitivity
analysis modeld






Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI)
Non-user (n = 1605) −0.61 (−0.67, −0.55) −0.58 (−0.63, −0.52) −0.46 (−0.51, 0.42) −0.45 (−0.50, −0.40) −0.32 (−0.36, 0.27) −0.31 (−0.35, −0.26)
H2RA user (n = 185) −0.54 (−0.68, −0.39) −0.51 (−0.65, −0.37) −0.44 (−0.55,−0.33) −0.45 (−0.56, −0.34) −0.37 (−0.47, −0.26) −0.36 (−0.47, −0.25)
PPI user (n = 207) −0.53 (−0.68, −0.38) −0.48 (−0.62, −0.33) −0.43 (−0.54,−0.32) −0.41 (−0.53, −0.29) −0.41 (−0.52, −0.29) −0.38 (−0.49, −0.27)
a

Main model adjusted for age, menopausal status, site, race, and BMI.

b

Spine MV model = primary model variables, smoking, diabetes, cancer, osteoporosis, vasomotor symptoms, hormone therapy, and bisphosphonate and thiazide diuretic use.

c

Femoral neck MV model = primary model variables, income, education level, physical activity, cancer, diabetes, hormone therapy, and bisphosphonate and thiazide diuretic use.

d

Total hip MV model = primary model variables, education level, physical activity, cancer, diabetes, hormone therapy, and bisphosphonate and thiazide diuretic use.