Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 21;6:467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00467

Table 5.

Random effect beta GLM of interval estimates predicted by causal valence, question types, and covariance in Study 1.

Variables Parameter Coefficient SE 2.5% 97.5%
Random intercept 0.57 0.10 0.38 0.76
Location submodel
Intercept b0 -1.06 0.13 -1.28 -0.80
Causal valence b1 -0.21 0.10 -0.40 0.00
Covar2 b2 0.12 0.04 0.04 0.19
Covar3 b3 -0.11 0.04 -0.18 -0.03
Structure b4 -0.10 0.04 -0.18 -0.02
Predictive b5 0.28 0.05 0.19 0.38
Precision submodel
Intercept d0 2.13 0.06 2.02 2.24
Causal valence d1 0.04 0.08 -0.12 0.19
Covar2 d2 0.05 0.09 -0.11 0.22
Covar3 d3 -0.08 0.08 -0.24 0.07
Structure d4 0.55 0.09 0.38 0.73
Predictive d5 -0.74 0.10 -0.92 -0.54
Covar2 × Causal valence d6 -0.15 0.06 -0.27 -0.03
Covar3 × Causal valence d7 0.18 0.08 0.03 0.33

Causal valence is coded as -1 = generative condition and 1 = preventive condition. The two dummy variables for covariation conditions: Covar2 is coded as -1 = C1, 1 = C2, and 0 = C3 condition. Covar3 is coded as -1 = C1, 0 = C2, and 1 = C3 condition. The coefficients of Covar2/Covar3 represent the difference between the ratings in the C2/C3 condition and the overall mean/precision of the causal ratings. The two dummy variables for question type conditions: Structure is coded as -1 = strength judgment, 1 = structure judgment, and 0 = predictive judgment; Predictive is coded as -1 = strength judgment, 0 = structure judgment, and 1 = predictive judgment. The coefficients of structure/predictive represent the difference between the ratings in the structure/predictive question and the overall mean/precision of the causal ratings.