Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 2;4(3):e982382. doi: 10.4161/2162402X.2014.982382

Table 5.

Systemic immune changes according to sentinel lymph node invasion (upper part) and sentinel IDO-positivity (lower part)

Sentinel invaded Sentinel non-invaded
Median IQR Min–max Median IQR Min–max p-value*
CTLA-4 expression by Tregs (%) 93.2 90.8–96.3 88.7–99.0 91.6 88.8–93.9 83.2–99.7 0.045
MFI for CTLA-4 in Tregs 1931 1720–2126 1261–2630 1695 1449–1955 1179–2985 0.036
pDCs (% of live PBMCs) 0.38 0.29–0.52 0.16–1.01 0.28 0.22–0.44 0.13–0.75 0.034
Sentinel IDO-positive Sentinel IDO-negative
Median IQR Min–max Median IQR Min–max p-value**
IDO+ PBMCs (%) 0.64 0.24–1.22 0.11–2.57 0.39 0.14–0.53 0.015–1.86 0.016
IDO+ mMDSCs (%) 0.60 0.16–1.29 0.00–14.10 0.095 0.035–0.60 0.00–1.52 0.018

CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4; IDO, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; IQR, interquartile range; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; pDC, plasmacytoid dendritic cell; Treg, regulatory T-cell. * p-values indicate significance of the difference between patients with invaded and non-invaded sentinel lymph nodes (Mann–Whitney-U Test). ** p-values indicate the significance of the difference between patients with IDO-positive and IDO-negative lymph nodes (Mann–Whitney-U Test).